Systemic financial risk indicators and securitised assets: an agent-based framework

被引:1
作者
Andrea Mazzocchetti
Eliana Lauretta
Marco Raberto
Andrea Teglio
Silvano Cincotti
机构
[1] University of Genoa,DIME
[2] Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria,CINEF
[3] University of Coventry,DICEAM
[4] University Ca’ Foscari of Venice,Research Centre of Financial and Corporate Integrity (CFCI), Faculty of Business and Law
[5] Jaume I University,Department of Economics
来源
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination | 2020年 / 15卷
关键词
Systemic risk; Systemic financial risk indicators; Securitisation; Housing market; Agent-based models; C63; R31; G21; G23;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The paper presents an agent-based model of a credit economy which includes a securitisation process and a bailout mechanism for bank bankruptcies. Within this framework, banks are able to sell mortgages to a financial vehicle corporation, which finances its activity by creating mortgage-backed securities and selling them to a mutual fund. In turn, the mutual fund collects liquidity by selling shares to households and remunerates them with a monthly interest. The impact of this mechanism is analysed by means of computational experiments for different levels of banks’ securitisation propensity. Furthermore, we study a set of systemic risk indicators which have the aim of assessing the imbalances in the financial system. Two of them are the mortgage-to-GDP ratio and the capital adequacy ratio, which are constructed to detect only the on-balance sheet changes in banks’ credit exposure. We consider two additional indicators, similar to the previous ones with the only difference that they are also able to account for the off-balance sheet items. Moreover, we adopt an indicator, the so-called “virtuous–unvirtuous cycle” indicator, which, besides off-balance assets, targets also the GDP. The results show that higher securitisation propensity weakens the financial stability of banks with relevant effects on different sectors of the economy. Most importantly, the analysis of systemic risk reveals the important issue of designing suitable systemic risk indicators for predicting incoming financial crises, finding that an essential feature of these indicators should be to integrate banks’ off-balance sheet assets.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 47
页数:38
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]  
Acharya VV(2017)Measuring systemic risk Rev Financ Stud 30 2-47
[2]  
Pedersen LH(2009)Causes of the financial crisis Crit Rev 21 195-210
[3]  
Philippon T(2016)CoVaR Am Econ Rev 106 1705-1741
[4]  
Richardson M(2013)Leading indicators of crisis incidence: evidence from developed countries J Int Money Finance 35 1-19
[5]  
Acharya VV(2015)Which are the SIFIs? A component expected shortfall approach to systemic risk J Bank Finance 50 575-588
[6]  
Richardson M(2010)Bank regulation, property prices and early warning systems for banking crises in OECD countries J Bank Finance 34 2255-2264
[7]  
Adrian T(2008)The evolution of the financial crisis of 2007–2008 Natl Inst Econ Rev 206 5-14
[8]  
Brunnermeier MK(2012)Debtrank: too central to fail? financial networks, the fed and systemic risk Sci Rep 2 1-6
[9]  
Babecký J(2015)On the systemic fragility of finance-led growth Metroeconomica 66 158-186
[10]  
Havránek T(2012)Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors J Financ Econ 104 535-559