Responsiveness to pamidronate treatment is not related to the genotype of type I collagen in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta

被引:0
作者
Junko Kanno
Akiko Saito-Hakoda
Shigeo Kure
Ikuma Fujiwara
机构
[1] Tohoku University School of Medicine,Department of Pediatrics
[2] Tohoku University School of Medicine,Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Environmental Medicine
来源
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism | 2018年 / 36卷
关键词
Osteogenesis imperfecta; Type I collagen; Pamidronate; Mutation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a heritable disorder characterized by increased bone fragility, low bone mass, dentinogenesis imperfecta, and blue sclerae. Most patients with OI have a mutation in either COL1A1 or COL1A2, which encode type I collagen. We screened these genes in Japanese patients with OI and compared their genotype and phenotype, focusing on the clinical response to treatment with pamidronate. Sequencing analysis of the genes in 19 families revealed 15 mutations, of which ten were missense mutations, thee were nonsense mutations, and two were frameshift mutations. Each of the 15 mutations was found in unrelated families, even though the patients were from a contiguous region surrounding our hospital. Substitutions of serine for glycine were the commonest mutation in both genes; notably, dentinogenesis imperfecta and fractures at birth were detected with higher frequencies in patients with this substitution when compared with other genotypes. The Z score of the bone mineral density of patients with this substitution was also lower than that of patients with other genotypes. Pamidronate treatment significantly increased the Z score in all patients, and increases in the Z score did not correlate with the OI types, causative genes, or genotype. In conclusion, the efficacy of pamidronate treatment does not seem to be related to the genotype of type I collagen in patients with OI.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 351
页数:7
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Rauch F(2004)Osteogenesis imperfecta Lancet 363 1377-1385
[2]  
Glorieux FH(2016)Osteogenesis imperfecta Lancet 387 1657-1671
[3]  
Forlino A(1979)Genetic heterogeneity in osteogenesis imperfecta J Med Genet 16 101-116
[4]  
Marini JC(2010)Genotype–phenotype correlations in nonlethal osteogenesis imperfecta caused by mutations in the helical domain of collagen type 1 Eur J Hum Genet 18 642-647
[5]  
Sillence DO(1990)Distinct biochemical phenotypes predict clinical severity in nonlethal variants of osteogenesis imperfecta Am J Hum Genet 46 975-982
[6]  
Senn A(1998)Analysis of the COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes by PCR amplification and scanning by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis identifies only COL1A1 mutations in 15 patients with osteogenesis imperfecta type I: identification of common sequences of null-allele mutations Am J Hum Genet 62 98-110
[7]  
Danks DM(2007)Mutations in type 1 collagen genes in Japanese osteogenesis imperfect patients Pediatr Int 49 564-569
[8]  
Rauch F(2007)Consortium for osteogenesis imperfecta mutations in the helical domain of type I collagen: regions rich in lethal mutations align with collagen binding sites for integrins and proteoglycans Hum Mutat 28 209-221
[9]  
Lalic L(2012)The identification of novel mutations in COL1A1, COL1A2, LEPRE1 genes in Chinese patients with osteogenesis imperfecta J Bone Miner Metab 30 69-77
[10]  
Roughley P(2010)Relationship between genotype and skeletal phenotype in children and adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta J Bone Miner Res 25 1367-1374