Measures of Neuroplastic and Functional Rearrangements during Recovery of Motor Function during Post-Stroke Rehabilitation

被引:0
作者
Fedotova I.R. [1 ]
Bobrov P.D. [1 ,2 ]
Kondur A.A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
[2] Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow
[3] Vladimirskii Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute, Moscow
关键词
diffusion tensor tractography; EEG; fMRI; functional and effective connectivity; laterality coefficient; motor rehabilitation; MRI; stroke;
D O I
10.1007/s11055-023-01548-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article reviews data on changes in indicators obtained from multichannel EEG, MRI, fMRI, and diffusion tensor tractography in poststroke patients during motor recovery. The main indicators most commonly analyzed in the literature on changes in the brain occurring both during traditional motor rehabilitation and during rehabilitation procedures using brain–computer interface technology are considered. Changes in the indicators discussed here reflect the dynamics of the involvement of the hemispheres, individual areas of the brain, and connections between them in solving motor tasks and constitute a manifestation of both instant functional rearrangements of the network and genuine neuroplastic (structural) changes in the brain. The functional roles of the hemispheres, individual areas, and connections between areas in the process of motor rehabilitation after stroke are discussed. © 2023, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
页码:1521 / 1533
页数:12
相关论文
共 129 条
[1]  
Ackerley S.J., Stinear C.M., Byblow W.D., Promoting use-dependent plasticity with externally-paced training, Clin. Neurophysiol., 122, 12, pp. 2462-2468, (2011)
[2]  
Almeida S.R., Vicentini J., Bonilha L., Et al., Brain connectivity and functional recovery in patients with ischemic stroke, J. Neuroimaging, 27, 1, pp. 65-70, (2017)
[3]  
Ameli M., Grefkes C., Kemper F., Et al., Differential effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex in cortical and subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke, Ann. Neurol., 66, 3, pp. 298-309, (2009)
[4]  
Ang K.K., Chua K.S., Phua K.S., Et al., A randomized controlled trial of EEG-based motor imagery brain–computer interface robotic rehabilitation for stroke, Clin. EEG Neurosci., 46, 4, pp. 310-320, (2015)
[5]  
Ang K.K., Guan C., Chua K.S.G., Et al., A large clinical study on the ability of stroke patients to use an EEG-based motor imagery brain–computer interface, Clin. EEG Neurosci., 42, 4, pp. 253-258, (2011)
[6]  
Ang K.K., Guan C., Phua K.S., Et al., Brain–computer interface-based robotic end effector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three-armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke, Front. Neuroeng., 7, (2014)
[7]  
Backhaus W., Braass H., Higgen F.L., Et al., Early parietofrontal network upregulation relates to future persistent deficits after severe stroke-a prospective cohort study, Brain Commun, 3, 2, (2021)
[8]  
Baron J.C., Cohen L.G., Cramer S.C., Et al., Neuroimaging in stroke recovery: a position paper from the First International Workshop on Neuroimaging and Stroke Recovery, Cerebrovasc. Dis., 18, 3, pp. 260-267, (2004)
[9]  
Bledowski C., Prvulovic D., Goebel R., Et al., Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: a combined ERP and fMRI study, NeuroImage, 22, 2, pp. 530-540, (2004)
[10]  
Buch E.R., Rizk S., Nicolo P., Et al., Predicting motor improvement after stroke with clinical assessment and diffusion tensor imaging, Neurology, 86, 20, pp. 1924-1925, (2016)