Evolution of the publications in clinical neurology: scientific impact of different countries during the 2000–2009 period

被引:0
作者
Jesus Iñigo
Jose-Alberto Palma
Jorge Iriarte
Elena Urrestarazu
机构
[1] Research Ethics Committee,Clinical Neurophysiology Section
[2] Comunidad de Madrid,undefined
[3] CUN,undefined
[4] Medical School,undefined
[5] University of Navarra,undefined
来源
Scientometrics | 2013年 / 95卷
关键词
Bibliometric analysis; Research; Scientific production; Scientific impact; Europe; Biomedical journals;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We analyzed the productivity and visibility of publications on the subject category of Clinical Neurology by countries in the period 2000–2009. We used the Science Citation Index Expanded database of the ISI Web of Knowledge. The analysis was restricted to the citable documents. Bibliometric indicators included the number of publications, the number of citations, the median and interquartile range of the citations, and the h-index. We identified 170,483 publications (84.9 % original articles) with a relative increase of 28.5 % throughout the decade. Fourteen countries published over 2,000 documents in the decade and received more than 50,000 citations. The average of citations received per publication was 8 (interquartile range: 3–20) and the h-index was 261. USA was the country with the highest number of publications, followed by Germany, Japan, the UK and Italy. Moreover, USA publications had the largest number of citations received (44.5 % of total), followed by the UK, Germany, Canada, and Italy. On the other hand, Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK had the highest median citations for their total publications. During the period 2000–2009 there was a significant increase in Clinical Neurology publications. Most of the publications and citations comprised 14 countries, with the USA in the first position. Interestingly, most of the publications and citations originated from only 14 countries, with European countries with relatively low population, such as Switzerland, Austria, Sweden, Belgium, and the Netherlands, in this top group.
引用
收藏
页码:941 / 952
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Bornmann L(2009)The state of h index research EMBO Reports 10 2-6
  • [2] Daniel HD(2012)Changes in stroke research productivity: a global perspective Surgical Neurology International 3 27-117
  • [3] Chow DS(2007)Hirsch-index for countries based on Essential Science Indicators data Scientometrics 73 91-360
  • [4] Hauptman JS(2008)Productivity and visibility of Cuban neuroscientists: bibliometric study of the period 2001–2005 Reviews Neurology 47 355-1390
  • [5] Wong TT(2006)A bibliometric analysis by geographic area of published research in several biomedical fields, 1995–2003 Canadian Medical Association Journal 175 1389-93
  • [6] Csajbók E(2006)The history and meaning of the journal impact factor (2006) JAMA 295 90-1272
  • [7] Berhidi A(2011)Research productivity in neurosurgery: trends in globalization, scientific focus, and funding Journal of Neurosurgery 115 1262-16572
  • [8] Vasas L(2005)An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 16569-316
  • [9] Schubert A(2004)The scientific impact of nations Nature 430 311-1096
  • [10] Dorta-Contreras AJ(2009)Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals JAMA 302 1092-287