Latent Class Symptom Profiles of Selective Mutism: Identification and Linkage to Temperamental and Social Constructs

被引:0
作者
Rachele Diliberto
Christopher A. Kearney
机构
[1] University of Nevada,Department of Psychology
[2] Las Vegas,undefined
来源
Child Psychiatry & Human Development | 2018年 / 49卷
关键词
Selective mutism; Latent class analysis; Anxiety; Oppositionality; Inattention;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Selective mutism (SM) is a stable, debilitating psychiatric disorder in which a child fails to speak in most public situations. Considerable debate exists as to the typology of this population, with empirically-based studies pointing to possible dimensions of anxiety, oppositionality, and communication problems, among other aspects. Little work has juxtaposed identified symptom profiles with key temperamental and social constructs often implicated in SM. The present study examined a large, diverse, non-clinical, international sample of children aged 6–10 years with SM to empirically identify symptom profiles and to link these profiles to key aspects of temperament (i.e., emotionality, shyness, sociability, activity) and social functioning (i.e., social problems, social competence). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed anxiety/distress, oppositionality, and inattention domains. In addition, latent class analysis revealed nuanced profiles labeled as (1) moderately anxious, oppositional, and inattentive, (2) highly anxious, and moderately oppositional and inattentive, and (3) mildly to moderately anxious, and mildly oppositional and inattentive. Class 2 was the most impaired group and was associated with greater emotionality, shyness, and social problems. Class 3 was the least impaired group and was associated with better sociability and social competence and activity. Class 1 was largely between the other classes, demonstrating less shyness and social problems than Class 2. The results help confirm previous findings of anxiety and oppositional profiles among children with SM but that nuanced classes may indicate subtle variations in impairment. The results have implications not only for subtyping this population but also for refining assessment and case conceptualization strategies and pursuing personalized and perhaps less lengthy treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 562
页数:11
相关论文
共 204 条
[1]  
Akaike H(1974)A new look at the statistical model identification IEE Trans Autom Control 19 716-723
[2]  
Ale CM(2013)Two cases of early childhood selective mutism: variations and treatment complexities Clin Case Stud 12 278-290
[3]  
Mann A(2013)Parental adjustment, parenting attitudes and emotional and behavioral problems in children with selective mutism J Anxiety Disord 27 9-15
[4]  
Menzel J(1998)Electively mute children: an analysis of 37 Danish cases Nord J Psychiatry 52 231-238
[5]  
Storch EA(2008)The development and psychometric properties of the selective mutism questionnaire J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 37 456-464
[6]  
Lewin AB(2002)Prevalence and description of selective mutism in a school-based sample J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 41 938-946
[7]  
Alyanak B(2010)Social competence, externalizing, and internalizing behavioral adjustment from early childhood through early adolescence: developmental cascades Dev Psychopathol 22 717-735
[8]  
Kilincaslan A(2013)The emotionality activity sociability temperament survey: factor analysis and temporal stability in a longitudinal cohort Pers Individ Differ 54 628-633
[9]  
Harmanci HS(2011)Selective mutism: a three-tiered approach to prevention and intervention Contemp Sch Psychol 15 53-63
[10]  
Demirkaya SK(1996)An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model J Classif 13 195-212