The effect of visuo-haptic congruency on haptic spatial matching

被引:0
作者
Amanda L. Kaas
Hanneke I. van Mier
Johan Lataster
Mirella Fingal
Alexander T. Sack
机构
[1] Max Planck Institute for Brain Research,Department of Neurophysiology
[2] University Maastricht,Department of Cognitive Neuroscience
[3] University Maastricht,Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, South Limburg Mental Health Research and Teaching Network, EURON
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2007年 / 183卷
关键词
Human; Reference frames; Egocentric; Allocentric; Tactile;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Eye-hand coordination is crucial for everyday visuo-haptic object-manipulation. Noninformative vision has been reported to improve haptic spatial tasks relying on world-based reference frames. The current study investigated whether the degree of visuo-haptic congruity systematically affects haptic task performance. Congruent and parametrically varied incongruent visual orientation cues were presented while participants manually explored the orientation of a reference bar stimulus. Participants were asked to haptically match this reference orientation by turning a test bar either to a parallel or mirrored orientation, depending on the instruction. While parallel matching can only be performed correctly in a world-based frame, mirror matching (in the mid-sagittal plane) can also be achieved in a body-centered frame. We revealed that visuo-haptic incongruence affected parallel but not mirror matching responses in size and direction. Parallel matching did not improve when congruent visual orientation cues were provided throughout a run, and mirror matching even deteriorated. These results show that there is no positive effect of visual input on haptic performance per se. Tasks, which favor a body-centered frame are immune to incongruent visual input, while such input parametrically modulates performance on world-based haptic tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 85
页数:10
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
Battaglia-Mayer A(2003)Multiple levels of representation of reaching in the parieto-frontal network Cereb Cortex 13 1009-1022
[2]  
Caminiti R(2005)The functional role of central and peripheral vision in the control of posture Hum Mov Sci 24 689-709
[3]  
Lacquaniti F(2002)Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching Nature 416 632-636
[4]  
Zago M(2000)Selective use of perceptual recalibration versus visuomotor skill acquisition J Neurophysiol 84 2703-2708
[5]  
Berensci A(2006)The influence of spatial de-location on perceptual integration of vision and touch PRESENCE Teleoperat Virtual Environ 15 353-357
[6]  
Ishihara M(2002)Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion Nature 415 429-433
[7]  
Imanaka K(2002)Crossmodal processing of object features in human anterior intraparietal cortex: an fMRI study implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys Neuron 35 173-184
[8]  
Buneo CA(2002)Perception of self-tilt in a true and illusory vertical plane Perception 31 1477-1490
[9]  
Jarvis MR(2001)Visually induced reorientation illusions Perception 30 583-600
[10]  
Batista AP(1998)Cross-modal transfer of information between the tactile and the visual representations in the human brain: a positron emission tomographic study J Neurosci 18 1072-1084