Ethylene oxide and breast cancer incidence in a cohort study of 7576 women (United States)

被引:0
作者
Kyle Steenland
Elizabeth Whelan
James Deddens
Leslie Stayner
Elizabeth Ward
机构
[1] National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH),School of Public Health
[2] NIOSH R13,undefined
[3] Emory University,undefined
来源
Cancer Causes & Control | 2003年 / 14卷
关键词
breast cancer; ethylene oxide;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Ethylene oxide (ETO) is a sterilant gas considered to be a human carcinogen, due primarily to excess hematopoietic cancer in exposed cohorts. ETO causes mammary tumors in mice, and has been associated with breast cancer incidence in one small epidemiologic study. Methods: We have studied breast cancer incidence in a cohort of 7576 women employed for at least one year and exposed for an average 10.7 years while working in commercial sterilization facilities. Breast cancer incidence (n = 319) was ascertained via interview, death certificates, cancer registries, and medical records. Interviews were obtained for 68% of the cohort. Results: The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) for incident breast cancer in the whole cohort using external referent rates (SEER) was 0.87 (0.77–0.97). The SIR for those in the top quintile of cumulative exposure, with a 15 year lag, was 1.27 (0.94–1.69), with a positive trend of increasing SIR with increasing exposure (p = 0.002). SIRs are under-estimated because breast cancer incidence in the whole cohort was under-ascertained, due to incomplete response and lack of complete coverage by state cancer registries. In internal nested case–control analyses of those with interviews (complete cancer ascertainment), controlling for reproductive risk factors, a positive exposure–response was found with the log of cumulative exposure with a 15-year lag (p = 0.0005). The odds ratio by quintile of cumulative exposure were 1.00 (0 exposure due to 15 year lag), 1.06, 0.99, 1.24, 1.42, and 1.87. Conclusions: Our data suggest that ETO is associated with breast cancer, but a causal interpretation is weakened due to some inconsistencies in exposure–response trends and possible biases due to non-response and incomplete cancer ascertainment.
引用
收藏
页码:531 / 539
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Norman S(1995)Cancer incidence in a group of workers potentially exposed to ethylene oxide Int J Epidemiol 24 276-284
  • [2] Berlin J(1999)Is breast cancer cluster influenced by environmental and occupational factors among hospital nurses in Hungary? Pathol Oncol Res 2 117-121
  • [3] Soper K(1991)An epidemiological study of cancer risk among workers exposed to ETO using hemoglobin adducts to validate environmental exposure assessments Occ Environ Health 63 271-277
  • [4] Middendorf B(1986)Epidemiologic support for ETO as a cancer-causing agent JAMA 255 1575-1578
  • [5] Stolley P(1989)Workers exposed to ETO: a follow-up study Brit J Ind Med 46 860-865
  • [6] Tompa A(1991)A cohort mortality study of workers exposed to ethylene oxide New Engl J Med 324 1402-1407
  • [7] Major J(1994)Statistical model for prediction of retrospective exposure to ethylene oxide in an occupational mortality study Am J Ind Med 25 825-836
  • [8] Jakab M(1998)NIOSH Life Table Program for Personal Computers Am J Ind Med 34 517-518
  • [9] Hagmar L(1997)Increased precision using countermatching in nested case-control studies Epidemiology 8 238-242
  • [10] Welinder H(1988)Regression models in clinical studies: determining relationships between predictors and response JNCI 80 1198-1202