The Rise and Fall of the Science Advisor to the President of the United States

被引:0
作者
Roger Pielke
Roberta Klein
机构
[1] University of Colorado,Center for Science and Technology Policy Research
来源
Minerva | 2009年 / 47卷
关键词
Science advice; Presidential science advisor; Science and government; Science and decision making;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The president’s science advisor was formerly established in the days following the Soviet launch of Sputnik at the height of the Cold War, creating an impression of scientists at the center of presidential power. However, since that time the role of the science advisor has been far more prosaic, with a role that might be more aptly described as a coordinator of budgets and programs, and thus more closely related to the functions of the Office of Management and Budget than the development of presidential policy. This role dramatically enhances the position of the scientific community to argue for its share of federal expenditures. At the same time, scientific and technological expertise permeates every function of government policy and politics, and the science advisor is only rarely involved in wider White House decision making. The actual role of the science advisor as compared to its heady initial days, in the context of an overall rise of governmental expertise, provides ample reason to reconsider the role of the presidential science advisor, and to set our expectations for that role accordingly.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 29
页数:22
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Bronk Detlev(1974)Science advice in the White House: The genesis of the president’s science advisers and the National Science Foundation Science 186 116-121
[2]  
Brumfiel Geoff(2004)US science policy: Mission impossible? Nature 428 250-251
[3]  
Damms Richard(2000)James Killian, the technological capabilities panel, and the emergence of President Eisenhower’s “scientific-technological elite” Diplomatic History 24 57-78
[4]  
Doel Ronald(2006)Prometheus unleashed: Science as a diplomatic weapon in the Lyndon B. Johnson administration Global Power Knowledge: Science and Technology in International Affairs 21 66-85
[5]  
Harper Kristine(1963)Central scientific organization in the United States government Minerva 1 453-469
[6]  
Dupree A Hunter(2006)The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework Science, Technology & Human Values 31 631-667
[7]  
Godin Benoît(1977)The National Science Foundation and the debate over postwar research policy, 1942–1945 Isis 68 5-26
[8]  
Kevles Daniel(1994)Layers of interests, layers of influence: Business and the genesis of the National Science Foundation Science, Technology & Human Values 19 259-282
[9]  
Kleinman Daniel Lee(1955)The present strains between science and government Social Forces 33 360-367
[10]  
Lamson Robert(1965)Scientists and the policy process The American Political Science Review 59 408-416