Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty; [Kinematisches Alignment in der Knieendoprothetik]

被引:0
作者
Weber P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gollwitzer H. [3 ]
机构
[1] ECOM—Excellent Center of Medicine, Arabellastr. 17, Munich
[2] Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich
[3] ATOS Klinik München, Munich
关键词
Functional results; Kinematic alignment; Leg axis; Ligament balancing; Mechanical alignment;
D O I
10.1007/s00064-021-00729-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective of kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty is to implant the prosthesis according to the individual joint line, leg axis and ligament tension. Indications: Knee osteoarthritis with failure of nonsurgical treatment according to current guidelines. Contraindications: Severe deformity or instability requiring a constrained knee prosthesis. Necessity of intramedullary stems. Surgical technique: Medial parapatellar approach to the knee. Resection of the cruciate ligaments, the meniscus and the osteophytes. Femur-first technique with distal resection of the femur, the intramedullary guide is only used for the extension/flexion positioning of the femoral component. The positioning in varus–valgus is orientated according to the native joint line after correction of chondral wear. The distal resection should be equal to the thickness of the prosthesis considering the chondral wear (up to 2 mm) and the thickness of the saw blade (1 mm). The rotation of the femoral component is set according to the posterior condylar axis under consideration of chondral wear. The amount of resected dorsal bone should correspond to the thickness of the dorsal condyles of the prosthesis. The alignment of the tibia is parallel to the individual joint line. This enables reconstruction of the individual physiological slope, rotation and the varus–valgus axis. Extension and flexion gap are controlled. Asymmetries between the lateral and medial joint space are corrected through a varus or valgus recut of the tibia as long as the surgical planning has not been achieved. The hip–knee angle is controlled; however, the aim in kinematic alignment is to reconstruct the individual axes and ligament tensions and not a straight leg axis. Persisting asymmetries in ligament tension are adjusted by classical soft tissue balancing techniques. Differences between the extension and flexion spaces are corrected by adapting the tibial slope. Release of the ligaments is usually not necessary; sometimes a stripping of the dorsal capsule is performed. After the trial implantation, the original prosthesis is implanted. Postoperative management: Functional rehabilitation with weight bearing as tolerated. Results: Randomized studies showed a better function in the Knee Society Score and a better range of motion with kinematically aligned prostheses compared to mechanical alignment. Available meta-analyses also showed better results for kinematically aligned knees. The first mid-term results of this new technique with a follow-up of 10 years show a survival rate of 97.5% of the prosthesis. © 2021, Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 537
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Sheth N.P., Husain A., Nelson C.L., Surgical techniques for total knee arthroplasty: measured resection, gap balancing, and hybrid, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 25, 7, pp. 499-508, (2017)
  • [2] Mercuri J.J., Et al., Gap balancing, measured resection, and kinematic alignment: how, when, and why?, JBJS Rev, 7, 3, (2019)
  • [3] Bellemans J., Et al., The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 470, 1, pp. 45-53, (2012)
  • [4] Williams D.P., Et al., Early postoperative predictors of satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty, Knee, 20, 6, pp. 442-446, (2013)
  • [5] Parvizi J., Et al., High level of residual symptoms in young patients after total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472, 1, pp. 133-137, (2014)
  • [6] Nam D., Nunley R.M., Barrack R.L., Patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a growing concern?, Bone Joint J, 96–B, pp. 96-100, (2014)
  • [7] Howell S.M., Et al., Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients, Orthopedics, 31, 9, pp. 857-863, (2008)
  • [8] Freeman M.A., Pinskerova V., The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint, J Biomech, 38, 2, pp. 197-208, (2005)
  • [9] Steinbruck A., Et al., Femorotibial kinematics and load patterns after total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro comparison of posterior-stabilized versus medial-stabilized design, Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 33, pp. 42-48, (2016)
  • [10] Lutzner J., Et al., The S2k guideline: indications for knee endoprosthesis: evidence and consent-based indications for total knee arthroplasty, Orthopade, 47, 9, pp. 777-781, (2018)