How contemporary bioclimatic and human controls change global fire regimes

被引:0
|
作者
Douglas I. Kelley
Ioannis Bistinas
Rhys Whitley
Chantelle Burton
Toby R. Marthews
Ning Dong
机构
[1] Centre for Ecology and Hydrology,Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences
[2] ATOS Nederland B.V.,School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Sciences
[3] Vrije Universiteit,Department of Biological Sciences
[4] Natural Perils Pricing,undefined
[5] Commercial and Consumer Portfolio and Product,undefined
[6] Suncorp Group,undefined
[7] Met Office Hadley Centre for Climate Science and Services,undefined
[8] University of Reading,undefined
[9] Macquarie University,undefined
来源
Nature Climate Change | 2019年 / 9卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Anthropogenically driven declines in tropical savannah burnt area1,2 have recently received attention due to their effect on trends in global burnt area3,4. Large-scale trends in ecosystems where vegetation has adapted to infrequent fire, especially in cooler and wetter forested areas, are less well understood. Here, small changes in fire regimes can have a substantial impact on local biogeochemistry5. To investigate trends in fire across a wide range of ecosystems, we used Bayesian inference6 to quantify four primary controls on burnt area: fuel continuity, fuel moisture, ignitions and anthropogenic suppression. We found that fuel continuity and moisture are the dominant limiting factors of burnt area globally. Suppression is most important in cropland areas, whereas savannahs and boreal forests are most sensitive to ignitions. We quantify fire regime shifts in areas with more than one, and often counteracting, trends in these controls. Forests are of particular concern, where we show average shifts in controls of 2.3–2.6% of their potential maximum per year, mainly driven by trends in fuel continuity and moisture. This study gives added importance to understanding long-term future changes in the controls on fire and the effect of fire trends on ecosystem function.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 696
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Demographic controls of future global fire risk
    Knorr W.
    Arneth A.
    Jiang L.
    Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6 (8) : 781 - 785
  • [22] How Change Catches Fire
    Schimpf, Megan O.
    FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 24 (04): : 257 - 257
  • [23] Pyrogeographic models, feedbacks and the future of global fire regimes
    Bowman, David M. J. S.
    Murphy, Brett P.
    Williamson, Grant J.
    Cochrane, Mark A.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2014, 23 (07): : 821 - 824
  • [24] EFFECT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON FIRE REGIMES IN NORTHWESTERN MINNESOTA
    CLARK, JS
    NATURE, 1988, 334 (6179) : 233 - 235
  • [25] Climate change impacts on future boreal fire regimes
    de Groot, William J.
    Flannigan, Michael D.
    Cantin, Alan S.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 294 : 35 - 44
  • [26] Power laws reveal phase transitions in landscape controls of fire regimes
    Donald McKenzie
    Maureen C. Kennedy
    Nature Communications, 3
  • [27] Power laws reveal phase transitions in landscape controls of fire regimes
    McKenzie, Donald
    Kennedy, Maureen C.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 3
  • [28] Contemporary fire regimes of northern Australia, 1997-2001: change since Aboriginal occupancy, challenges for sustainable management
    Russell-Smith, J
    Yates, C
    Edwards, A
    Allan, GE
    Cook, GD
    Cooke, P
    Craig, R
    Heath, B
    Smith, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2003, 12 (3-4) : 283 - 297
  • [29] Fire Suppression and the Wildfire Paradox in Contemporary China: Policies, Resilience, and Effects in Chinese Fire Regimes
    Hayes, Jack Patrick
    HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2021, 49 (01) : 19 - 32
  • [30] Fire Suppression and the Wildfire Paradox in Contemporary China: Policies, Resilience, and Effects in Chinese Fire Regimes
    Jack Patrick Hayes
    Human Ecology, 2021, 49 : 19 - 32