Development and use of a test instrument to measure biology teachers’ content knowledge (CK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)

被引:0
作者
Melanie Jüttner
Williame Boone
Soonhye Park
Birgit J. Neuhaus
机构
[1] Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich,Biology Education, Faculty of Biology
[2] Miami University,undefined
[3] University of Iowa,undefined
来源
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability | 2013年 / 25卷
关键词
Biology teachers; Content knowledge; Pedagogical content knowledge; Professional knowledge; Students’ understanding; Rasch analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research on teachers’ professionalism and professional development has increased in the last two decades. A main focus of this line of research has been the cognitive component of teacher professionalism, i.e., professional knowledge. Most of the previous studies on teacher knowledge—such as the Learning Mathematics for Teaching (LMT) (Hill et al. 2004), the Professional Competence of Teachers, Cognitively Activating Instruction, and Development of Students´ Mathematical Literacy (COACTIV) (Baumert et al. 2010), and the Mathematics Teaching in the 21st Century (MT21) (Schmidt et al. 2007) studies—have been conducted in the field of mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and content knowledge (CK). There have been few comparable studies conducted with science teachers, especially biology teachers. To fill the gap, this study examines the development and use of instruments to measure biology teachers’ CK and PCK. In particular, this study describes a method to develop reliable, objective, and valid instruments measuring teachers’ CK and PCK in four steps by the use of empirical data of students. Additionally, the study explores whether CK and PCK might be measured as separate knowledge categories by using a paper-and-pencil test. This paper presents a theoretical model that guides test development and provides steps to develop and validate the instruments. Details are also provided regarding the computation of the Rasch scale score measures for 158 biology teachers. The results indicate that the instruments measured teachers’ CK and PCK in an objective, valid, and reliable way. This suggests that the new instruments can be used in combination with classroom observations to examine teaching quality and further its relation to student learning.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 67
页数:22
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
Alexander PA(1991)Coming to terms: how researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge Review of Educational Research 61 315-343
[2]  
Schallert DL(1978)A rating formulation for ordered response categories Psychometrika 43 561-573
[3]  
Hare VC(2009)Mapping Rasch-based measurement onto the argument-based validity framework Rasch Measurement Transactions 23 1192-1193
[4]  
Andrich D(1993)Expert and novice, earth and space science: teachers’ declarative, procedural and structural knowledge International Journal of Science Education 15 273-282
[5]  
Aryadoust SV(2010)Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress American Educational Research Journal 47 133-180
[6]  
Barba R(2008)Revisiting the roots of pedagogical content knowledge International Journal of Science Education 30 1271-1279
[7]  
Rubba PA(2008)Effectiveness of teacher education: state of research, measurement issues and consequences for future studies ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education 40 719-734
[8]  
Baumert J(2008)Introduction to the issue on empirical research on mathematics teachers and their education ZDM Mathematics Education 40 715-717
[9]  
Kunter M(2005)Rigour in quantitative analysis: The promise of Rasch analysis techniques African Journal of Research in SMT Education 9 25-38
[10]  
Blum W(2006)The role of Rasch analysis when conducting science education research utilizing multiple-choice tests Science Education 90 253-269