From the Editors’ Desk: Bias in Systematic Reviews—Let the Reader Beware

被引:0
作者
Jeffrey L. Jackson
Akira Kuriyama
机构
[1] Zablocki VAMC,Department of General Medicine, Emergency and Critical Care Center
[2] Medical College of Wisconsin,undefined
[3] Kurashiki Central Hospital,undefined
来源
Journal of General Internal Medicine | 2018年 / 33卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 135
页数:2
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Dechartres A(2011)Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study Ann Intern Med. 155 39-51
[2]  
Boutron I(1996)Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews Lancet. 347 363-6
[3]  
Trinquart L(2017)Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis BMC Med Res Methodol. 17 39-645
[4]  
Charles P(1997)Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects BMJ. 315 640-66
[5]  
Ravaud P(2000)Treatment of fibromyalgia with antidepressants: a meta-analysis J Gen Intern Med. 15 659-2465
[6]  
Moher D(2004)Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles JAMA 291 2457-406
[7]  
Fortin P(2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence J Clin Epidemiol. 64 401-33
[8]  
Jadad AR(2015)A comparative effectiveness meta-analysis of commonly prescribed drugs for the prophylaxis of migraine headache PLOS One. 10 e0130733-undefined
[9]  
Wetterslev J(2008)Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) J Clin Epidemiol. 61 17-undefined
[10]  
Jakobsen JC(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined