Feature frequency effects in recognition memory

被引:0
作者
Kenneth J. Malmberg
Mark Steyvers
Joseph D. Stephens
Richard M. Shiffrin
机构
[1] Indiana University,Department of Psychology
来源
Memory & Cognition | 2002年 / 30卷
关键词
Recognition Memory; Mirror Effect; Rare Word; Uncommon Feature; Letter Frequency;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Rare words are usually better recognized than common words, a finding in recognition memory known as theword-frequency effect. Some theories predict the word-frequency effect because they assume that rare words consist of more distinctive features than do common words (e.g., Shiffrin & Steyvers's, 1997, REM theory). In this study, recognition memory was tested for words that vary in the commonness of their orthographic features, and we found that recognition was best for words made up of primarily rare letters. In addition, a mirror effect was observed: Words with rare letters had a higher hit rate and a lower false-alarm rate than did words with common letters. We also found that normative word frequency affects recognition independently of letter frequency. Therefore, the distinctiveness of a word's orthographic features is one, but not the only, factor necessary to explain the word-frequency effect.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 613
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Dennis S.(2001)A context noise model of episodic word recognition Psychological Review 108 452-478
  • [2] Humphreys M. S.(1984)A retrieval model for both recognition and recall Psychological Review 91 1-67
  • [3] Gillund G.(1985)The mirror effect in recognition memory Memory & Cognition 13 8-20
  • [4] Shiffrin R. M.(1990)The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 16 5-16
  • [5] Glanzer M.(1980)The role of nonsemantic information in memory: Orthographic distinctiveness effects on retention Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 109 49-74
  • [6] Adams J. K.(2000)Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 26 1534-1555
  • [7] Glanzer M.(1973)Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 12 119-131
  • [8] Adams J. K.(1997)Direct and indirect stimulusfrequency effects in recognition Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 23 539-559
  • [9] Hunt R. R.(2002)List composition and the word-frequency effect for recognition memory Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 28 616-630
  • [10] Elliott J. M.(1998)Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory Psychological Review 105 724-760