A combined approach for analysing heuristic algorithms

被引:0
作者
Jeroen Corstjens
Nguyen Dang
Benoît Depaire
An Caris
Patrick De Causmaecker
机构
[1] UHasselt,
[2] Research Group Logistics,undefined
[3] KU Leuven,undefined
[4] CODeS,undefined
[5] imec-ITEC,undefined
来源
Journal of Heuristics | 2019年 / 25卷
关键词
Functional analysis of variance; fANOVA; Multilevel regression; Algorithm performance; Vehicle routing problem with time windows; Large neighbourhood search; Iterated local search; Unrelated parallel machine scheduling problem;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When developing optimisation algorithms, the focus often lies on obtaining an algorithm that is able to outperform other existing algorithms for some performance measure. It is not common practice to question the reasons for possible performance differences observed. These types of questions relate to evaluating the impact of the various heuristic parameters and often remain unanswered. In this paper, the focus is on gaining insight in the behaviour of a heuristic algorithm by investigating how the various elements operating within the algorithm correlate with performance, obtaining indications of which combinations work well and which do not, and how all these effects are influenced by the specific problem instance the algorithm is solving. We consider two approaches for analysing algorithm parameters and components—functional analysis of variance and multilevel regression analysis—and study the benefits of using both approaches jointly. We present the results of a combined methodology that is able to provide more insights than when the two approaches are used separately. The illustrative case studies in this paper analyse a large neighbourhood search algorithm applied to the vehicle routing problem with time windows and an iterated local search algorithm for the unrelated parallel machine scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 628
页数:37
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Bartz-Beielstein T(2004)Design and analysis of optimization algorithms using computational statistics Appl. Numer. Anal. Comput. Math. 1 413-433
  • [2] Parsopoulos KE(1996)A new generation of vehicle routing research: robust algorithms, addressing uncertainty Oper. Res. 44 286-97
  • [3] Vrahatis MN(2010)Mixed models for the analysis of optimization algorithms Exp. Methods Anal. Optim. Algorithms 1 225-327
  • [4] Bertsimas DJ(2001)Using experimental design to find effective parameter settings for heuristics J. Heuristics 7 77-28
  • [5] Simchi-Levi D(1995)Overfitting and undercomputing in machine learning ACM Comput. Surv. CSUR 27 326-732
  • [6] Chiarandini M(2015)Analysing differences between algorithm configurations through ablation J. Heuristics 22 1-42
  • [7] Goegebeur Y(2012)Generalized functional anova diagnostics for high-dimensional functions of dependent variables J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 16 709-306
  • [8] Coy SP(1995)Testing heuristics: we have it all wrong J. Heuristics 1 33-680
  • [9] Golden BL(2009)Paramils: an automatic algorithm configuration framework J. Artif. Intell. Res. 36 267-58
  • [10] Runger GC(1983)Empirical hardness models: methodology and a case study on combinatorial auctions Optimization by simulated annealing. science 220 671-2435