Impact of annotation quality on model performance of welding defect detection using deep learning

被引:0
作者
Jinhan Cui
Baoxin Zhang
Xiaopeng Wang
Juntao Wu
Jiajia Liu
Yan Li
Xiong Zhi
Wenpin Zhang
Xinghua Yu
机构
[1] Beijing Institute of Technology,School of Materials Science & Engineering
[2] Beijing Institute of Technology,Chongqing Innovation Center
[3] Chongqing Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute,undefined
来源
Welding in the World | 2024年 / 68卷
关键词
Non-destructive testing; Defect detection; Annotation quality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The use of X-ray-based non-destructive testing (NDT) methods is widespread in the task of welding defect detection. Many scholars have turned to deep-learning computer vision models for defect detection in weld radiographic images in recent years. Before model training, annotating the collected image data is often necessary. We need to use annotation information to guide the model for effective learning. However, many researchers have been focused on developing better models or refining training strategies, often overlooking the quality of data annotation. This paper delved into the impact of eight types of low-quality annotations on the accuracy of object detection models. In comparison to accurate annotations, inaccuracies in the annotated locations significantly impact model performance, while errors in category annotations have a minor effect on model performance. Incorrect location affects both the recall and precision of the model, while incorrect categorization only impacts the precision of the model. Additionally, we observed that the extent of the impact of location errors is related to the detection accuracy of individual classes, with classes having higher original detection AP experiencing more substantial decreases in AP under location errors. Finally, we analyzed the influence of annotator habits on model performance. The study examines the effects of various types of low-quality annotations on model training and their impact on individual detection categories. Annotator habits lead to the left boundary of annotated boxes being less accurate than the right boundary, resulting in a greater impact of annotations biased to the left than those biased to the right. Based on experiments and analysis, we proposed annotation guidelines for weld defect detection tasks: prioritize the quality of location annotations over category accuracy and strive to include all objects, including those with ambiguous boundaries.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 865
页数:10
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Zahran O(2013)Automatic weld defect identification from radiographic images NDT E Int 57 26-35
[2]  
Kasban H(2017)Automated detection of welding defects in pipelines from radiographic images DWDI NDT E Int 86 7-13
[3]  
El-Kordy M(2019)Deep features based on a DCNN model for classifying imbalanced weld flaw types Measurement 131 482-489
[4]  
El-Samie FEA(2019)A smart monitoring system for automatic welding defect detection IEEE Trans Industr Electron 66 9641-9650
[5]  
Boaretto N(2019)Welding defects detection based on deep learning with multiple optical sensors during disk laser welding of thick plates J Manuf Syst 51 87-94
[6]  
Centeno TM(2019)Weld image deep learning-based on-line defects detection using convolutional neural networks for Al alloy in robotic arc welding J Manuf Process 45 208-216
[7]  
Hou W(2021)Deep learning based steel pipe weld defect detection Appl Artif Intell 35 1237-1249
[8]  
Wei Y(2023)Defects detection in weld joints based on visual attention and deep learning NDT E Int 133 102764-4858
[9]  
Jin Y(2023)Welding seam detection and location: deep learning network-based approach Int J Press Vessels Pip 202 104893-948
[10]  
Zhu C(2022)The effect of improving annotation quality on object detection datasets: a preliminary study IEEE/CVF Conf Comput Vision Pattern Recog Workshop (CVPRW) 2022 4849-2338