Changes in the activities of carbon metabolizing enzymes with pod development in lentil (Lens culinaris L.)

被引:0
|
作者
Jyoti Chopra
Narinder Kaur
Anil K. Gupta
机构
[1] Punjab Agricultural University,Department of Biochemistry
来源
关键词
leguminosae; lentil; carbon metabolism; sucrose metabolism; sucrose synthase; sucrose phosphate synthase; invertase; phosphoenol pyruvate carboxylase; malic enzyme; isocitrate dehydrogenase;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Activities of some key enzymes of carbon metabolism sucrose synthase, acid and alkaline invertase, phosphoenol pyruvate carboxylase, malic enzyme and isocitrate dehydrogenase were investigated in relation to the carbohydrate status in lentil pods. Sucrose remained the dominant soluble sugar in the pod wall and seed, with hexoses (glucose and fructose) present at significantly lower levels. Sucrose synthase is the predominant sucrolytic enzyme in the developing seeds of lentil (Lens culinaris L.). Acid invertase was associated with pod elongation and showed little activity in seeds. Sucrose breakdown was dominated by alkaline invertase during the development of podwall, while both the sucrose synthase and alkaline invertase were active in the branch of inflorescence. A substantial increase of sucrolytic enzymes was observed at the time of maximum seed filling stage (10–20 DAF) in lentil seed. The pattern of activity of sucrose synthase highly paralleled the phase of rapid seed filling and therefore, can be correlated with seed sink strength. It seems likely that the fruiting structures of lentil utilize phosphoenol pyruvate carboxylase for recapturing respired carbon dioxide. Higher activities of isocitrate dehydrogenase and malic enzyme in the seed at the time of rapid seed filling could be effectively linked to the deposition of protein reserves.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 191
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Changes in the activities of carbon metabolizing enzymes with pod development in lentil (Lens culinaris L.)
    Chopra, J
    Kaur, N
    Gupta, AK
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGIAE PLANTARUM, 2003, 25 (02) : 185 - 191
  • [2] Influence of seed size on pod development in lentil (Lens culinaris)
    Kumari, Jyoti
    Chandra, S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2011, 81 (04): : 380 - 382
  • [3] Studies on glucose-metabolizing enzymes in cytosolic and bacteroidal fractions of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) and lentil 17 (Lens culinaris L.) nodules
    Munjral, N.
    Gupta, A. K.
    Kaur, N.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY & BIOPHYSICS, 2007, 44 (03): : 186 - 189
  • [4] Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) cultivation in Sweden: possibilities and challenges
    Fogelberg, Fredrik
    Martensson, Anna M.
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION B-SOIL AND PLANT SCIENCE, 2024, 74 (01):
  • [5] MYCOFLORA ASSOCIATED WITH LENTIL (LENS CULINARIS L.) SEEDS OF PAKISTAN
    Rahim, Summiaya
    Dawar, Shahnaz
    Tariq, Marium
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2010, 42 (06) : 4345 - 4352
  • [6] Impacts of Trace Element Addition on Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) Agronomy
    Islam, Md. Moshiul
    Karim, Md. Razaul
    Oliver, Md. Moinul Hosain
    Urmi, Tahmina Akter
    Hossain, Md. Ashraf
    Haque, M. Moynul
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2018, 8 (07):
  • [7] Soil carbon dynamics effect on growth and yield of Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) with varying tillage practices
    Ul Hassan, Mehmood
    Qayyum, Abdul
    Rafique, Mazhar
    Almoallim, Hesham S.
    Ansari, Mohammad Javed
    EMIRATES JOURNAL OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2024, 36
  • [8] Effect of seed halopriming on antioxidation efficiency in lentil ( Lens culinaris L.) seedlings
    Ben Ammar, Wided
    Attia, Houneida
    Saleh, Muneera A.
    Alamer, Khalid H.
    Chaffei-Haouari, Chiraz
    AGROCHIMICA, 2023, 67 (3-4):
  • [9] Lentil (Lens culinaris L.): A prebiotic-rich whole food legume
    Johnson, Casey R.
    Thavarajah, Dil
    Combs, Gerald F., Jr.
    Thavarajah, Pushparajah
    FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 51 (01) : 107 - 113
  • [10] Grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) damage to flowers and pods of lentil (Lens culinaris L.)
    Olfert, O
    Slinkard, A
    CROP PROTECTION, 1999, 18 (08) : 527 - 530