Responsibility, talent, and compensation: A second-best analysis

被引：0

作者：

Bossert W. ^{[1
]}

Fleurbaey M. ^{[2
]}

Van De Gaer D. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, University Park

[2] THEMA, Université de Cergy-Pontoise, F-95011 Cergy-Pontoise Cedex

[3] Department of Economics, NUI-University of Maynooth, Maynooth, Co. Kildare

来源：

Review of Economic Design | 1999年 / 4卷 / 1期

关键词：

Compensation; Opportunities; Optimal tax; Second-best;

D O I：

10.1007/s100580050025

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This paper examines how the first-best models of compensation based on the agents' talents and responsibilities analyzed in some recent contributions can be extended to a second-best context. A few social criteria are proposed and compared to alternative approaches by Roemer and Van de gaer. © Springer-Verlag 1999.

引用

页码：35 / 55

页数：20

共 29 条

[1]

Arneson R.J., Equality and equal opportunity for welfare, Philosophical Studies, 56, pp. 77-93, (1989)

[2]

Bossert W., Redistribution mechanisms based on individual characteristics, Mathematical Social Sciences, 29, pp. 1-17, (1995)

[3]

Bossert W., Opportunity sets and individual well-being, Social Choice and Welfare, 14, pp. 97-112, (1997)

[4]

Bossert W., Fleurbaey M., Redistribution and compensation, Social Choice and Welfare, 13, pp. 343-355, (1996)

[5]

Bossert W., Pattanaik P.K., Xu Y., Ranking opportunity sets: An axiomatic approach, Journal of Economic Theory, 63, pp. 326-345, (1994)

[6]

Cohen G.A., On the currency of egalitarian justice, Ethics, 99, pp. 906-944, (1989)

[7]

Dutta B., Sen A., Ranking opportunity sets and Arrow impossibility theorems: Correspondence results, Journal of Economic Theory, 71, pp. 90-101, (1996)

[8]

Dworkin R., What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare, Part 2: Equality of resources, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, pp. 185-246, (1981)

[9]

Fleurbaey M., On fair compensation, Theory and Decision, 36, pp. 277-307, (1994)

[10]

Fleurbaey M., Three solutions for the compensation problem, Journal of Economic Theory, 65, pp. 505-521, (1995)

← 1 2 3 →