Converging on sustainable placemaking through transdisciplinary process

被引:0
作者
Alexander R. [1 ]
Britt L. [2 ]
Barrella E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Political Science, James Madison University, 91 E. Grace St. MSC 7705, Harrisonburg, 22807, VA
[2] Department of Communication Studies, James Madison University, 54 Bluestone Drive MSC 2106, Harrisonburg, 22807, VA
[3] Department of Engineering, James Madison University, 801 Carrier Drive MSC 4413, Harrisonburg, 22807, VA
关键词
Placemaking; Sustainability; Sustainable design; Transdisciplinary;
D O I
10.1007/s13412-014-0192-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This research examines the first phase of a multiyear initiative about “sustainable placemaking” processes at a mid-size university in a small US city. The study focuses upon the rhetoric used by five faculty members representing the industrial design, engineering, geography, art history, and political science disciplines who have begun to develop a sustainable design working group whose mission is to produce sustainable design and design process alternatives for the redevelopment of a street connecting the university to the community. Integrating symbolic convergence theory and dialogue theory from communication studies with theory about transdisciplinary approaches to sustainable development, the research describes the extent to which the group achieved transdisciplinary function and articulates how co-creating meaning around sustainable placemaking shaped group processes and outcomes. Findings indicate that shared experiences of “place” and tensions amongst rhetorical boundaries play key roles. Analysis produces lessons learned for similar groups interested in transcending disciplinary boundaries when addressing sustainable development problems. © 2014, AESS.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 309
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Alhadeff-Jones M., Three generations of complexity theories: nuances and ambiguities, Educ Philos Theory, 40, 1, pp. 66-82, (2008)
[2]  
Becker E., The structure of evil, (1976)
[3]  
Bohm D., On dialogue, (1996)
[4]  
Bormann E.G., The symbolic convergence theory of communication: applications and implications for teachers and consultants, J Appl Commun Res, (1982)
[5]  
Bormann E.G., Symbolic convergence theory: a communication formulation, J Commun, (1985)
[6]  
Brandt P., Ernst A., Gralla F., Luederitz C., Lang D.J., Newig J., Reinert F., Abson D., von Wehrden H., A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science, Ecol Econ, 92, pp. 1-15, (2013)
[7]  
Burke K., A rhetoric of motives, (1969)
[8]  
Charmaz K., Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis, (2006)
[9]  
Choi B.C., Pak A.W., Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness, Clin Invest Med, 29, 6, pp. 351-364, (2006)
[10]  
Ellinor L., Gerard G., Dialogue: rediscovering the transforming power of conversation, (1998)