A novel molecule of the angiotensin II receptor blocker class: Focus on olmesartan medoxomil

被引:0
作者
Volpe M. [1 ,3 ]
Trimarco B. [2 ]
机构
[1] II Faculty of Medicine, University of Rome La Sapienza, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome
[2] Department of Clinical Medicine and Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples
[3] II Faculty of Medicine, University of Rome La Sapienza, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, 1035-39, 00189, Via di Grottarossa
关键词
Losartan; Amlodipine; Felodipine; Valsartan; Candesartan;
D O I
10.2165/00151642-200512020-00004
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pharmacological selective inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is an effective and safe treatment for essential hypertension. Inhibition of this system not only produces consistent reductions in blood pressure, related to vasodilatation and other relevant mechanisms, but can also reverse the pathological structural remodelling of the heart and vasculature, which may contribute to improvements in vascular morbidity and mortality. Thus, the inclusion of angiotensin II receptor antagonists among the major antihypertensive classes meets the clinical needs of this condition and represents an important therapeutic approach. Beyond the treatment of hypertension, there is mounting evidence that angiotensin II receptor antagonists may exert powerful renoprotective actions, reduce new-onset diabetes mellitus and improve outcomes in heart failure. Furthermore, this class of drugs is unique among antihypertensive agents in terms of tolerability profile. Several different molecules with the property of selectively inhibiting the binding of angiotensin II to the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptors have been introduced into pharmacotherapy over time. All have been extensively tested in hypertension and other disease conditions. Most recently, a new angiotensin II receptor blocker compound, olmesartan medoxomil, has been introduced to clinical use for the therapy of hypertension. This paper provides a synthetic overview of olmesartan medoxomil, which has been demonstrated to be effective in reducing blood pressure levels, with an early onset of the antihypertensive efficacy within the first 2 weeks of treatment. The rapid onset of efficacy may partially explain the excellent responder rates observed with this new drug. © 2005 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 89
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Wolf-Maier K., Cooper R.S., Banegas J.R., Et al., Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States, JAMA, 289, 18, pp. 2363-2369, (2003)
[2]  
MacMahon S., Peto R., Cutler J., Et al., Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: Part 1. Prolonged differences in blood pressure: Prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias, Lancet, 335, pp. 765-774, (1990)
[3]  
Collins R., Peto R., MacMahon S., Et al., Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: Part 2. Short-term reductions in blood pressure: Overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context, Lancet, 335, pp. 827-839, (1990)
[4]  
Vasan R.S., Larson M.G., Leip E.P., Et al., Impact of high-normal blood pressure on the risk of cardiovascular disease, New Engl J Med, 345, 18, pp. 1291-1297, (2001)
[5]  
Hoogen P.C., Feskens E.J., Nagelkerke N.J., Et al., The relation between blood pressure and mortality due to coronary heart disease among men in different parts of the world: Seven Countries Study Research Group, N Engl J Med, 342, pp. 1-8, (2000)
[6]  
Neaton J.D., Wentworth D., Serum cholesterol, blood pressure, cigarette smoking and death from coronary heart disease: Overall findings and differences by age for 316,099 white men, Arch Intern Med, 152, pp. 56-64, (1992)
[7]  
Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium antagonists, and other blood pressure lowering drugs: Results of prospectively designed overviews of randomized trials, Lancet, 355, pp. 1955-1964, (2000)
[8]  
Pahor M., Psaty B.M., Alderman M.H., Et al., Health outcomes associated with calcium antagonists compared with other first-line antihypertensive therapies: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, Lancet, 356, 9246, pp. 1949-1954, (2000)
[9]  
Anderson K.M., Odell P.M., Wilson P.W., Et al., Cardiovascular disease risk profile, Am Heart J, 121, pp. 293-298, (1991)
[10]  
Kannel W.B., Risk stratification in hypertension: New insights from the Framingham Study, Am J Hypertens, 13, 1 PART 2, (2000)