Economic Evaluation of a Multi-Stage Return to Work Program for Workers on Sick-Leave Due to Low Back Pain

被引:0
作者
Ivan A. Steenstra
Johannes R. Anema
Maurits W. van Tulder
Paulien M. Bongers
Henrica C. W. de Vet
Willem van Mechelen
机构
[1] VU University Medical Center,Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine
[2] VU University Medical Center,Department of Public and Occupational Health
[3] TNO Work and Employment,Body@Work
[4] Research Center Physical Activity,Institute for Health Sciences
[5] Work and Health,undefined
[6] TNO-VU,undefined
[7] VU University,undefined
[8] Institute for Work and Health,undefined
来源
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | 2006年 / 16卷
关键词
Low back pain; Operant behavioural; Participative Ergonomics; Return to work; Randomized Controlled Trial; Cost-effectiveness; Occupational health;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a return to work (RTW) program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain (LBP), comparing a workplace intervention implemented between 2 to 8 weeks of sick-leave with usual care, and a clinical intervention after 8 weeks of sick-leave with usual care. Design: Economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Study population: Workers sick-listed for a period of 2 to 6 weeks due to LBP. Interventions: 1. workplace assessment, work modifications and case management). 2. physiotherapy based on operant behavioural principles. 3. usual care: provided by an occupational physician. Outcomes: The primary outcome was return to work (RTW). Other outcomes were pain intensity, functional status, quality of life and general health. The economic evaluation was conducted from a societal perspective. Outcomes were assessed at baseline (after 2–6 weeks on sick-leave), and 12 weeks, 26 weeks, and 52 weeks after the first day of sick-leave. Results: The workplace intervention group returned to work 30.0 days (95% CI=[3.1, 51.3]) earlier on average than the usual care group at slightly higher direct costs (ratio of 1 day: €19). Workers in the clinical intervention group that had received usual care in the first 8 weeks returned to work 21.3 days (95% CI= [−74.1, 29.2]) later on average. The group that had received the workplace intervention in the first 8 weeks and the clinical intervention after 8 weeks returned to work 50.9 days (95% CI=[−89.4, −2.7]) later on average. A workplace intervention was more effective than usual care in RTW at slightly higher costs and was equally effective as usual care at equal costs on other outcomes. A clinical intervention was less effective than usual care and associated with higher costs. Conclusion: The workplace intervention results in a safe and faster RTW than usual care at reasonable costs for workers on sick-leave for two to six weeks due to LBP.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 578
页数:21
相关论文
共 160 条
[11]  
Bouter LM(2002)Cost-Benefit and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Disability Prevention Model for Back Pain Management: a Six Year Follow Up Study Occup Environ Med 59 807-15
[12]  
Lee P(2005)Prognostic Factors for Duration of Sick Leave Due to Low-Back Pain in Dutch Health Care Professionals J Occup Rehabil 15 591-605
[13]  
Abenhaim L(1994)Management of Occupational Back Pain: the Sherbrooke Model. Results of a Pilot and Feasibility Study Occup Environ Med 51 597-602
[14]  
Suissa S(1997)A Population-Based, Randomized Clinical Trial on Back Pain Management Spine 22 2911-8
[15]  
Hlobil H(2004)Graded Activity for Low Back Pain in Occupational Health Care: a Randomized, Controlled Trial Ann Intern Med 140 77-84
[16]  
Staal JB(1992)The Effect of Graded Activity on Patients With Subacute Low Back Pain: a Randomized Prospective Clinical Study With an Operant-Conditioning Behavioral Approach Phys Ther 72 279-90
[17]  
Spoelstra M(2003)Occupational Health Guidelines for the Management of Low Back Pain: an International Comparison Occup Environ Med 60 618-26
[18]  
Ariens GA(2002)Participatory Ergonomics Applied in Installation Work Appl Ergon 33 439-48
[19]  
Smid T(2001)Implementation of a Participatory Ergonomics Program in the Rehabilitation of Workers Suffering From Subacute Back Pain Appl Ergon 32 53-60
[20]  
van Mechelen W(2001)Samenwerking Van Huisarts En Bedrijfsarts: Een Leidraad Voor De Praktijk (Cooperation Between General Practitioner and Occuaptional Practitioner: a Guideline for Practise) Medisch Contact 56 790-3