Human capital contributions to explain productivity differences

被引:0
作者
Konstantinos Chatzimichael
Vangelis Tzouvelekas
机构
[1] Cyprus University of Technology,Deptartment of Commerce, Finance and Shipping, Faculty of Management and Economics
[2] University of Crete,Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences
来源
Journal of Productivity Analysis | 2014年 / 41卷
关键词
Labor productivity; Labor efficiency; Multilateral modes of production; Human capital; O47; O57; C23;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper develops a parametric decomposition framework of labor productivity growth relaxing the assumption of labor-specific efficiency. The decomposition analysis is applied to a sample of 121 developed and developing countries during the 1970–2007 period drawn from the recently updated Penn World Tables and Barro and Lee (A new data set of educational attainment in the world 1950–2010. NBER Working Paper No. 15902, 2010) educational databases. A generalized Cobb–Douglas functional specification is used taking into account differences in technological structures across groups of countries to approximate aggregate production technology using Jorgenson and Nishimizu (Econ J 88:707–726, 1978) bilateral model of production. The measurement of labor efficiency is based on Kopp’s (Quart J Econ 96:477–503, 1981) orthogonal non-radial index of factor-specific efficiency modified in a parametric frontier framework. The empirical results indicate that the weighted average annual rate of labor productivity growth was 1.239 % over the period analyzed. Technical change was found to be the driving force of labor productivity, while improvements in human capital and factor intensities account for the 19.5 and 12.4 % of that productivity growth, respectively. Finally, labor efficiency improvements contributed by 9.8 % to measured labor productivity growth.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 417
页数:18
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Abramovitz M(1986)Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind J Econ Hist 46 385-406
  • [2] Acemoglu D(1998)Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality Quart J Econ 113 1055-1090
  • [3] Acemoglu D(2001)Productivity differences Quart J Econ 116 563-606
  • [4] Zilibotti F(2008)Technological change and transition: relative contributions to worldwide growth during the 90s Oxf Bull Econ Stat 70 461-492
  • [5] Badunenko O(1993)International comparisons of educational attainment J Monet Econ 32 363-394
  • [6] Hennderson DJ(1998)Appropriate technology and growth Quart J Econ 113 1025-54
  • [7] Zelenyuk V(2001)How to compete: the impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity Rev Econ Stat 83 434-445
  • [8] Barro RJ(1976)Extended hicks neutral technological change Econ J 86 845-52
  • [9] Lee JW(1990)Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time-series variation in efficiency levels J Econ 46 185-200
  • [10] Basu S(1991)Effects of technological change and institutional reform on production growth in chinese agriculture Am J Agric Econ 73 266-275