Attention please! Enhanced attention control abilities compensate for instructional impairments in multimedia learning

被引:0
作者
Maria Wirzberger
Günter Daniel Rey
机构
[1] TU Chemnitz,Psychology of Learning with Digital Media, Institute for Media Research, Faculty of Humanities
关键词
Multimedia learning; Controlled attention; Interruptions; Seductive details; Learning performance;
D O I
10.1007/s40692-018-0106-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Learners exposed to multimedia learning contexts have to deal with a variety of visual stimuli, demanding a conducive design of learning material to maintain limitations in attentional resources. Within the current study, effects and constraints arising from two selected impairing features are investigated in more detail within a computer-based learning task on factor analysis. A sample of 53 students received a combination of textual and pictorial elements that explained the topic, while impaired attention was systematically induced in a 2 × 2 factorial between-subjects design by interrupting system-notifications (with vs. without) and seductive text passages (with vs. without). Learners’ ability for controlled attention was assessed with a standardized psychological attention inventory. Approaching the results, learners receiving seductive text passages spent significantly more time on the learning material. In addition, a moderation effect of attention control abilities on the relationship between interruptions and retention performance resulted. Explanations for the obtained findings are discussed referring to mechanisms of compensation, load, and activation.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 257
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Dienes Z(2014)Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results Frontiers in Psychology 5 781-657
[2]  
Drummond SP(2000)Altered brain response to verbal learning following sleep deprivation Nature 403 655-274
[3]  
Brown GG(2013)Caffeine as an attention enhancer: reviewing existing assumptions Psychopharmacology (Berl) 225 251-14
[4]  
Gillin JC(1999)Multimedia: Differences in cognitive processes observed with EEG Educational Technology Research and Development 47 5-434
[5]  
Stricker JL(1998)How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning Journal of Educational Psychology 90 414-183
[6]  
Wong EC(2001)A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 169-1997
[7]  
Buxton RB(2014)Working memory load and distraction: dissociable effects of visual maintenance and cognitive control Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 76 1985-148
[8]  
Einöther SJL(2010)Attention, distraction, and cognitive control under load Current Directions in Psychological Science 19 143-354
[9]  
Giesbrecht T(2004)Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 339-1168
[10]  
Gerě I(2014)The pen is mightier than the keyboard advantages of longhand over laptop note taking Psychological Science 25 1159-408