Adaptation in a multi-stressor environment: Perceptions and responses to climatic and economic risks by coffee growers in Mesoamerica

被引:60
作者
Eakin H. [1 ]
Tucker C.M. [2 ]
Castellanos E. [3 ]
Diaz-Porras R. [4 ]
Barrera J.F. [5 ]
Morales H. [6 ]
机构
[1] School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287
[2] Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
[3] Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City
[4] Centro Internacional de Política Económica para el Desarrollo Sostenible, Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Heredia
[5] El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Tapachula, Chiapas
[6] El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Autonomous adaptation; Climate change; Coffee production; Livelihood strategies; Market volatility; Mesoamerica;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-013-9466-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
While climate change adaptation policy has tended to focus on planned adaptation interventions, in many vulnerable communities, adaptation will consist of autonomous, "unplanned" actions by individuals who are responding to multiple simultaneous sources of change. Their actions are likely not only to affect their own future vulnerability, but, through changes in livelihoods and resource use, the vulnerability of their community and resource base. In this paper, we document the autonomous changes to livelihood strategies adopted by smallholder coffee farmers in four Mesoamerican countries (Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, and Costa Rica). Our aim is to gain insight into the process of autonomous adaptation by proxy: through an assessment of how farmers explain their choices in relation to distinct stressors; and an understanding of the set of choices available to farmers. We find that climatic stress is a feature in decision making, but not the dominant driver. Nevertheless, the farmers in our sample are evidently flexible, adaptive, and experimental in relation to changing circumstances. Whether their autonomous responses to diverse stressors will result in a reduction in risk over time may well depend on the extent to which policy, agricultural research, and rural investments build on the inherent logic of these strategies. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 139
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Bacon C., Who decides what is fair in fair trade? The agri-environmental governance of standards, access and price, Journal of Peasant Studies, 37, pp. 111-147, (2010)
[2]  
Beer J., Muschler R., Kass D., Somarriba E., Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations, Agroforestry Systems, 38, pp. 139-164, (1998)
[3]  
Brown K., Westaway E., Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: Lessons from human development, well-being and disasters, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36, pp. 11-22, (2011)
[4]  
Burton I., Huq S., Limc B., Pilifosovad O., Schipper E.L., From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: The shaping of adaptation policy, Climate Policy, 2, 3, pp. 145-159, (2002)
[5]  
Clarence-Smith W.G., Topik S., The Global Coffee Economy in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 1500-1989, (2003)
[6]  
Cruz-Bello G.M., Eakin H., Morales H., Barrera J.F., Linking multi-temporal analysis and community consultation to evaluate the response to the impact of Hurricane Stan in coffee areas of Chiapas, Mexico, Natural Hazards, 58, pp. 103-116, (2011)
[7]  
Daviron B., Ponte S., The Coffee Paradox: Global Markets, Commodity Trade and the Elusive Promise of Development, (2005)
[8]  
de Janvry A., Sadoulet E., Income strategies among rural households in Mexico: The role of off-farm activities, World Development, 29, 3, pp. 467-480, (2001)
[9]  
Descroix F., Snoeck J., Environmental factors suitable for coffee production, Coffee: Growing, Processing, Sustainable Production, 2nd Rev Edn, pp. 168-181, (2009)
[10]  
Eakin H., Institutional change, climate risk, and rural vulnerability: Cases from central Mexico, World Development, 33, 11, pp. 1923-1938, (2005)