Validation of an accelerometer system for measuring physical activity and sedentary behavior in healthy children and adolescents

被引:0
作者
Camilla Milther
Lærke Winther
Michelle Stahlhut
Derek John Curtis
Mette Aadahl
Morten Tange Kristensen
Jette Led Sørensen
Christian Have Dall
机构
[1] Juliane Marie Centre and Mary Elizabeths Hospital,Center for Clinical Research and Prevention
[2] Copenhagen University Hospital,Institute of Clinical Medicine
[3] Child Centre Copenhagen,Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy
[4] The Child and Youth Administration,undefined
[5] University of Copenhagen,undefined
[6] Copenhagen University Hospital,undefined
来源
European Journal of Pediatrics | 2023年 / 182卷
关键词
Validity; Accelerometer; Children; Adolescents; Physical activity; Sedentary behavior;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The study aims to assess the concurrent validity of the SENS motion® accelerometer system for device-based measurement of physical activity and sedentary behavior in healthy children and adolescents. Thirty-six healthy children and adolescents (mean ± standard deviation (SD) age, 10.2 ± 2.3 years) were fitted with three SENS sensors while performing standardized activities including walking, fast walking, sitting/lying, and arm movements. Data from the sensors were compared with video observations (reference criteria). The agreement between SENS motion® and observation was analyzed using Student’s t-test and illustrated in Bland–Altman plots. The concurrent validity was further evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and was expressed as standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Strong agreement was found between SENS and observation for walking time, sedentary time, and lying time. In contrast, moderate agreement was observed for number of steps, sitting time, and time with and without arm movement. ICC2.1 values were overall moderate to excellent (0.5–0.94), with correspondingly low SEM% for walking time, sedentary time, lying time, and time with arm movement (2–9%). An acceptable SEM% level was reached for both steps and sitting time (11% and 12%). For fast walking time, the results showed a weak agreement between the measurement methods, and the ICC value was poor.
引用
收藏
页码:3639 / 3647
页数:8
相关论文
共 151 条
  • [1] Guthold R(2018)Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants Lancet Glob Heal 6 e1077-e1086
  • [2] Stevens GA(2020)Variations in accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time across Europe — harmonized analyses of 47,497 children and adolescents Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 17 38-406
  • [3] Riley LM(2015)Objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time in youth: the International Children’s Accelerometry Database (ICAD) Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 12 113-153
  • [4] Bull FC(2014)Reliable assessment of physical activity in disease: an update on activity monitors Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 17 401-1041
  • [5] Steene-Johannessen J(2019)Measurement of physical activity in clinical practice using accelerometers J Intern Med 286 137-73
  • [6] Hansen BH(2022)Validation of two activity monitors in slow and fast walking hospitalized patients Rehabil Res Pract 2022 9230081-134
  • [7] Dalene KE(2018)Reliability and construct validity of the SENS motion Arthritis 2018 6596278-1277
  • [8] Kolle E(1995) activity measurement system as a tool to detect sedentary behaviour in patients with knee osteoarthritis Med Sci Sports Exerc 27 1033-2602
  • [9] Northstone K(2000)The level and tempo of children’s physical activities: an observational study Res Q Exerc Sport 71 59-399
  • [10] Møller NC(2022)Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children Infancy 27 115-310