Interactive effects of light and nutrients on phytoplankton stoichiometry

被引:0
|
作者
Elizabeth M. Dickman
Michael J. Vanni
Martin J. Horgan
机构
[1] Miami University,Department of Zoology
来源
Oecologia | 2006年 / 149卷
关键词
Carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus ratio; Lake; Light–nutrient hypothesis; Nitrogen; Phosphorus;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The stoichiometric composition of autotrophs can vary greatly in response to variation in light and nutrient availability, and can mediate ecological processes such as C sequestration, growth of herbivores, and nutrient cycling. We investigated light and nutrient effects on phytoplankton stoichiometry, employing five experiments on intact phytoplankton assemblages from three lakes varying in productivity and species composition. Each experiment employed two nutrient and eight irradiance levels in a fully factorial design. Light and nutrients interactively affected phytoplankton stoichiometry. Thus, phytoplankton C:N, C:P, and N:P ratios increased with irradiance, and slopes of the stoichiometric ratio versus irradiance relationships were steeper with ambient nutrients than with nutrients added. Our results support the light–nutrient hypothesis, which predicts that phytoplankton C:nutrient ratios are functions of the ratio of available light and nutrients; however, we observed considerable variation among lakes in the expression of this relationship. Phytoplankton species diversity was positively correlated with the slopes of the C:N and C:P versus irradiance relationships, suggesting that diverse assemblages may exhibit greater flexibility in the response of phytoplankton nutrient stoichiometry to light and nutrients. The interactive nature of light and nutrient effects may render it difficult to generate predictive models of stoichiometric responses to these two factors. Our results point to the need for future studies that examine stoichiometric responses across a wide range of phytoplankton communities.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 689
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Effects of light and nutrients on plankton stoichiometry and biomass in a P-limited lake
    James J. Elser
    Paul Frost
    Marcia Kyle
    Jotaro Urabe
    Tom Andersen
    Hydrobiologia, 2002, 481 : 101 - 112
  • [12] The stoichiometry of particulate nutrients in Lake Tanganyika -: implications for nutrient limitation of phytoplankton
    Järvinen, M
    Salonen, K
    Sarvala, J
    Vuorio, K
    Virtanen, A
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 1999, 407 (0) : 81 - 88
  • [13] Effects of light and nutrients on seasonal phytoplankton succession in a temperate eutrophic coastal lagoon
    Jeana L. Drake
    Edward J. Carpenter
    Mary Cousins
    Kara L. Nelson
    Alejandro Guido-Zarate
    Keith Loftin
    Hydrobiologia, 2010, 654 : 177 - 192
  • [14] Effects of light and nutrients on seasonal phytoplankton succession in a temperate eutrophic coastal lagoon
    Drake, Jeana L.
    Carpenter, Edward J.
    Cousins, Mary
    Nelson, Kara L.
    Guido-Zarate, Alejandro
    Loftin, Keith
    HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2010, 654 (01) : 177 - 192
  • [16] Direct and interactive effects of light and nutrients on the legume-rhizobia mutualism
    Lau, Jennifer A.
    Bowling, Evan James
    Gentry, Lowell E.
    Glasser, Paul A.
    Monarch, Elizabeth A.
    Olesen, Whitney M.
    Waxmonsky, Jillian
    Young, Ryan Thomas
    ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2012, 39 : 80 - 86
  • [17] Phytoplankton stoichiometry
    Klausmeier, C. A.
    Litchman, E.
    Daufresne, T.
    Levin, S. A.
    ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 23 (03) : 479 - 485
  • [18] Temperature effects on stocks and stability of a phytoplankton-zooplankton model and the dependence on light and nutrients
    Norberg, J
    DeAngelis, D
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1997, 95 (01) : 75 - 86
  • [19] Temperature-dependent responses to light and nutrients in phytoplankton
    Heinrichs, Anna Lena
    Happe, Anika
    Koussoroplis, Apostolos-Manuel
    Hillebrand, Helmut
    Merder, Julian
    Striebel, Maren
    ECOLOGY, 2025, 106 (03)
  • [20] Phytoplankton, light, and nutrients in a gradient of mixing depths: Theory
    Diehl, S
    ECOLOGY, 2002, 83 (02) : 386 - 398