Metrology part 2: Procedures for the validation of major measurement quality criteria and measuring instrument properties

被引:0
|
作者
Pierre Squara
Thomas W. L. Scheeren
Hollmann D. Aya
Jan Bakker
Maurizio Cecconi
Sharon Einav
Manu L. N. G. Malbrain
Xavier Monnet
Daniel A. Reuter
Iwan C. C. van der Horst
Bernd Saugel
机构
[1] Clinique Ambroise Paré,Department of Cardiology and ICU
[2] University of Groningen,Department of Anesthesiology
[3] University Medical Centre Groningen,Intensive Care
[4] St Georges’ University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust,Departmento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina
[5] Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile,Department of Intensive Care Adults
[6] Erasmus MC University Medical Center,Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care
[7] New York University,Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine
[8] Columbia University Medical Center,Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care
[9] Humanitas University,General Intensive Care Unit of the Shaare Zedek Medical Centre
[10] Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine,Department of Intensive Care
[11] University Hospital Brussels (UZB),Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy
[12] Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB),Medical Intensive Care Unit
[13] Paris-Sud University Hospitals,Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
[14] Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris,Department of Intensive Care
[15] Inserm UMR S_999,Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine
[16] University Medical Center Rostock,undefined
[17] Maastricht University Medical Center+,undefined
[18] University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,undefined
[19] Outcomes Research Consortium,undefined
来源
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | 2021年 / 35卷
关键词
Statistics; Critical care; Perioperative medicine; Hemodynamic monitoring; Cardiovascular dynamics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A measurement is always afflicted with some degree of uncertainty. A correct understanding of the different types of uncertainty, their naming, and their definition is of crucial importance for an appropriate use of the measuring instruments. However, in perioperative and intensive care medicine, the metrological requirements for measuring instruments are poorly defined and often used spuriously. The correct use of metrological terms is also of crucial importance in validation studies. The European Union published a new directive on medical devices, mentioning that in the case of devices with a measuring function, the notified body is involved in all aspects relating to the conformity of the device with the metrological requirements. It is therefore the task of scientific societies to establish the standards in their area of expertise. After adopting the same understandings and definitions (part 1), the different procedures for the validation of major quality criteria of measuring devices must be consensually established. In this metrologic review (part 2), we review the terms and definitions of validation, some basic processes leading to the display of an indication from a physiologic signal, and procedures for the validation of measuring instrument properties, with specific focus on perioperative and intensive care medicine including appropriate examples.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 37
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Metrology part 2: Procedures for the validation of major measurement quality criteria and measuring instrument properties
    Squara, Pierre
    Scheeren, Thomas W. L.
    Aya, Hollmann D.
    Bakker, Jan
    Cecconi, Maurizio
    Einav, Sharon
    Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.
    Monnet, Xavier
    Reuter, Daniel A.
    van der Horst, Iwan C. C.
    Saugel, Bernd
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2021, 35 (01) : 27 - 37
  • [2] Metrology part 1: definition of quality criteria
    Pierre Squara
    Thomas W. L. Scheeren
    Hollmann D. Aya
    Jan Bakker
    Maurizio Cecconi
    Sharon Einav
    Manu L. N. G. Malbrain
    Xavier Monnet
    Daniel A. Reuter
    Iwan C. C. van der Horst
    Bernd Saugel
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2021, 35 : 17 - 25
  • [3] Metrology part 1: definition of quality criteria
    Squara, Pierre
    Scheeren, Thomas W. L.
    Aya, Hollmann D.
    Bakker, Jan
    Cecconi, Maurizio
    Einav, Sharon
    Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.
    Monnet, Xavier
    Reuter, Daniel A.
    van der Horst, Iwan C. C.
    Saugel, Bernd
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2021, 35 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [4] Development and validation of a measuring instrument of the quality audit service
    Sierra Garcia, Laura
    Orta Perez, Manuel
    Moreno Garcia, Francisco Javier
    REVISTA DE CONTABILIDAD-SPANISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2017, 20 (02) : 167 - 175
  • [5] Development and validation of an instrument for measuring total quality service
    Saravanan, R.
    Rao, K. S. P.
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2006, 17 (06) : 733 - 749
  • [6] General problems of metrology and measurement technique - Effects of measuring instrument errors on the properties of second-order plans
    Bakradze, GG
    Zedginidze, IG
    Beraya, NO
    MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2006, 49 (02) : 107 - 113
  • [7] Validation of the Measurement Algorithms in Instrument for Power Quality Estimation
    Masnicki, Romuald
    2016 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (EEEIC), 2016,
  • [8] Quality of psychiatric care: validation of an instrument for measuring inpatient opinion
    Gigantesco, A
    Morosini, P
    Bazzoni, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 15 (01) : 73 - 78
  • [9] Measuring the Quality of Shock Care - Validation of a Chart Abstraction Instrument
    Mould-Millman, N.
    Dixon, J.
    Thomas, J.
    Burkholder, T.
    Oberfoell, N.
    Oberfoell, S.
    McDaniel, K.
    Meese, H.
    de Vries, S.
    Wallis, L.
    Ginde, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 197
  • [10] Measuring Critical Factors of Software Quality Management: Development and Validation of an Instrument
    Vitharana, Padmal
    Mone, Mark
    INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 21 (02) : 18 - 37