Brain connectivity in major depressive disorder: a precision component of treatment modalities?

被引:0
作者
Asude Tura
Roberto Goya-Maldonado
机构
[1] University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG),Laboratory of Systems Neuroscience and Imaging in Psychiatry (SNIP
来源
Translational Psychiatry | / 13卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a very prevalent mental disorder that imposes an enormous burden on individuals, society, and health care systems. Most patients benefit from commonly used treatment methods such as pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). However, the clinical decision on which treatment method to use remains generally informed and the individual clinical response is difficult to predict. Most likely, a combination of neural variability and heterogeneity in MDD still impedes a full understanding of the disorder, as well as influences treatment success in many cases. With the help of neuroimaging methods like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), the brain can be understood as a modular set of functional and structural networks. In recent years, many studies have investigated baseline connectivity biomarkers of treatment response and the connectivity changes after successful treatment. Here, we systematically review the literature and summarize findings from longitudinal interventional studies investigating the functional and structural connectivity in MDD. By compiling and discussing these findings, we recommend the scientific and clinical community to deepen the systematization of findings to pave the way for future systems neuroscience roadmaps that include brain connectivity parameters as a possible precision component of the clinical evaluation and therapeutic decision.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 494 条
[31]  
Zhang F(2019)White matter indices of medication response in major depression: a diffusion tensor imaging study Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 4 1640-46
[32]  
Chin Fatt CR(2021)White matter microstructure alterations associated with paroxetine treatment response in major depression Front Behav Neurosci 15 533-56
[33]  
Jha MK(2020)State-independent microstructural white matter abnormalities in major depressive disorder Front Psychiatry 11 e63081-e380
[34]  
Cooper CM(2020)State-independent and -dependent structural connectivity alterations in depression Front Psychiatry 11 609-97
[35]  
Fonzo G(2015)Resting-state connectivity predictors of response to psychotherapy in major depressive disorder Neuropsychopharmacol 40 47-603
[36]  
South C(2015)Prefrontal thinning affects functional connectivity and regional homogeneity of the anterior cingulate cortex in depression Neuropsychopharmacol 40 414-37
[37]  
Grannemann B(2017)Functional connectivity of the subcallosal cingulate cortex and differential outcomes to treatment with cognitive-behavioral therapy or antidepressant medication for major depressive disorder Am J Psychiatry 174 661-e7.
[38]  
Korgaonkar MS(2013)Early-stage psychotherapy produces elevated frontal white matter integrity in adult major depressive disorder PLoS ONE 8 113461-e56.
[39]  
Goldstein-Piekarski AN(2015)A functional MRI marker may predict the outcome of electroconvulsive therapy in severe and treatment-resistant depression Mol Psychiatry 20 1983-4
[40]  
Fornito A(2022)Enhanced default mode network functional connectivity links with electroconvulsive therapy response in major depressive disorder J Affect Disord 306 4337-9