Does context matter? The gendered impact of study conditions on dropout intentions from higher education; [Welche Rolle spielt der Kontext? Der geschlechtsspezifische Einfluss von Studienbedingungen auf Studienabbruchintentionen]

被引:0
作者
Marczuk A. [1 ]
Strauss S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Research Group on Higher Education, University of Konstanz, Box 37, Konstanz
[2] Department of Sociology, University of Konstanz, Box 26, Konstanz
关键词
Dropout; Gender; German Student Survey; Higher education; Study conditions;
D O I
10.1007/s11618-023-01175-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper aims to understand how study conditions impact men and women’s dropout intentions differently. As a first step, we analyse the gendered impact of three aspects of study conditions that were at the centre of the Bologna Process: achievement norms, the structure of the curriculum and practical components in the study programme. As a second step, we aim to understand how individual-level differences between men and women (performance, academic self-efficacy and perceived psychological burdens) mediate this gendered impact of study conditions on dropout intentions. We use the German Student Survey data (2000–2016), which allows for valid measurement of study conditions at the subject group level. Our results show that women’s dropout intentions tend to increase in study contexts with high achievement norms, while men benefit more than women from highly structured study contexts. The practical component, in turn, lowers the dropout intentions of both groups equally. © 2023, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:1349 / 1371
页数:22
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Aelenei C., Martinot D., Sicard A., Darnon C., When an academic culture based on self-enhancement values undermines female students’ sense of belonging, self-efficacy, and academic choices, The Journal of Social Psychology, 160, 3, pp. 373-389, (2020)
[2]  
Aymans S.C., Kauffeld S., To leave or not to leave? Critical factors for university dropout among first-generation students, Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 10, 4, pp. 23-43, (2015)
[3]  
Bandura A., Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change, Psychological review, 84, 2, pp. 191-215, (1977)
[4]  
Bandura A., Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales, Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5, pp. 307-337, (2006)
[5]  
Bargmann C., Thiele L., Kauffeld S., Motivation matters: predicting students’ career decidedness and intention to drop out after the first year in higher education, Higher Education, 83, 4, pp. 845-861, (2022)
[6]  
Bartolo D., Bjerke C.a.€..H., Blattler A., Deca L., Gielis I., Karlsson S., Santa R., Bologna at the Finish Line: An Account of Ten Years of European Higher Education Reform, (2010)
[7]  
Beierlein C., Kovaleva A., Kemper C., Rammstedt B., Allgemeine Selbstwirksamkeit Kurzskala ASKU – Manual, (2012)
[8]  
Belloc F., Maruotti A., Petrella L., University drop-out: an Italian experience, Higher Education, 60, 2, pp. 127-138, (2010)
[9]  
Bennett R., Determinants of undergraduate student drop out rates in a university business studies department, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27, 2, pp. 123-141, (2003)
[10]  
Berk R., MacDonald J.M., Overdispersion and poisson regression, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 3, pp. 269-284, (2008)