Modeling Strategy Switches in Multi-attribute Decision Making

被引:0
作者
Lee M.D. [1 ]
Gluck K.A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA
[2] 711 Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Dayton, OH
关键词
Bayesian methods; Change-point detection; Decision making; Spike-and-slab priors; Strategies and heuristics;
D O I
10.1007/s42113-020-00092-w
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We develop and demonstrate a method for inferring changes in strategy use, applicable to decision making in multi-attribute choice. The method is an extension of one developed by Lee, Gluck, and Walsh (Decision 6:335–368, 2019) and continues to rely on a Bayesian approach for inferring strategy switches based on spike-and-slab priors. The extensions improve the existing method in two ways. The first is by using a hierarchical approach to make inferences about the underlying propensity to switch strategies simultaneously at both the individual and group levels. The second is by making inferences about the probability different strategies are used, including the transition probabilities between strategies when switches are made. We demonstrate the method by applying it to data sets from five previous experiments, involving a range of experimental designs and sets of strategies of interest. We conclude by discussing the potential of the method to contribute to addressing basic questions in human decision making involving the nature of adaptation, learning, and self-regulation. © 2020, Society for Mathematical Psychology.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 163
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Bergert F.B., Nosofsky R.M., A response-time approach to comparing generalized rational and take-the-best models of decision making, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 33, pp. 107-129, (2007)
[2]  
Bobadilla-Suarez S., Love B.C., Fast or frugal, but not both: decision heuristics under time pressure, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, pp. 24-33, (2018)
[3]  
Broder A., Assessing the empirical validity of the “take-the-best” heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 26, pp. 1332-1346, (2000)
[4]  
Broder A., Schiffer S., Adaptive flexibility and maladaptive routines in selecting fast and frugal decision strategies, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, pp. 904-918, (2006)
[5]  
Brooks S.P., Gelman A., General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, pp. 434-455, (1997)
[6]  
Brusovansky M., Glickman M., Usher M., Fast and effective: intuitive processes in complex decisions, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, pp. 1542-1548, (2018)
[7]  
Dawes R.M., Corrigan B., Linear models in decision making, Psychological Bulletin, 81, pp. 95-106, (1974)
[8]  
Ericsson K.A., Simon H.A., Protocol analysis, (1993)
[9]  
Farrell S., Lewandowsky S., Computational modeling of cognition and behavior, (2018)
[10]  
Gigerenzer G., Goldstein D.G., Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality, Psychological Review, 103, pp. 650-669, (1996)