Phase II trial of temozolomide (TMZ) plus irinotecan (CPT-11) in adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme before radiotherapy

被引:0
作者
Jennifer A. Quinn
Sara Xiaoyin Jiang
David A. Reardon
Annick Desjardins
James J. Vredenburgh
Allan H. Friedman
John H. Sampson
Roger E. McLendon
James E. Herndon
Henry S. Friedman
机构
[1] Duke University Medical Center,Department of Surgery, The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center
[2] Duke University Medical Center,Department of Pathology
[3] Duke University Medical Center,Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
来源
Journal of Neuro-Oncology | 2009年 / 95卷
关键词
Temozolomide; Glioblastoma multiforme; Irinotecan; Radiotherapy; Newly diagnosed;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This phase II trial evaluated efficacy and safety of temozolomide (TMZ) in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) before radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Prior to radiotherapy, patients were treated with a maximum of three 6-week cycles of TMZ and CPT-11. Patients received TMZ at a dose of 200 mg/m2/day on days 1–5 and CPT-11 on days 1, 8, 22, and 29, with a dose adjustment for enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drug use. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and tumor O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) expression. Of the 42 patients treated, 8 (19%) patients achieved a partial response. Median PFS and median OS were 3.1 and 13.8 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 AEs were documented in 36% of patients, most of which were hematologic (29%). Twenty-four percent of patients had grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic AEs, with gastrointestinal AEs being the most common (12%) Two patients died, one of intracranial hemorrhage and one of treatment-related renal failure. Low MGMT expression, compared with high MGMT expression, showed no significant difference in ORR (25 vs. 8%), median PFS (14 vs. 5 months) or OS (21 vs. 15 months). Although TMZ plus CPT-11 is at least comparable in efficacy to TMZ alone, this combination appears more toxic and poorly tolerated. The lack of correlation of activity with MGMT expression is intriguing, but needs further evaluation in subsequent trials.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 400
页数:7
相关论文
共 351 条
[1]  
Weingart J(2007)Phase I trial of polifeprosan 20 with carmustine implant plus continuous infusion of intravenous O J Clin Oncol 25 399-404
[2]  
Grossman SA(2005)-benzylguanine in adults with recurrent malignant glioma: New approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy CNS Consortium trial N Engl J Med 352 987-996
[3]  
Carson KA(2000)Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma Br J Cancer 83 588-593
[4]  
Fisher JD(1999)A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse J Clin Oncol 17 2762-2771
[5]  
Delaney SM(2004)Multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or anaplastic oligoastrocytoma at first relapse. Temodal Brain Tumor Group Neuro-oncology 6 21-27
[6]  
Rosenblum ML(2003)Phase 2 study of weekly irinotecan in adults with recurrent malignant glioma: final report of NABTT 97-11 Cancer 97 2381-2386
[7]  
Olivi A(1999)Two studies evaluating irinotecan treatment for recurrent malignant glioma using an every-3-week regimen J Clin Oncol 17 1516-1525
[8]  
Judy K(2003)Irinotecan therapy in adults with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma Ann Oncol 14 603-614
[9]  
Tatter SB(2002)Multicentre phase II study and pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan in chemotherapy-naive patients with glioblastoma Neuro-oncology 4 102-108
[10]  
Dolan ME(2003)Phase II study of irinotecan (CPT-11) in children with high-risk malignant brain tumors: the Duke experience Clin Cancer Res 9 2940-2949