Individual and cumulative association of commonly used biomarkers on frailty: a cross-sectional analysis of the Mexican Health and Aging Study

被引:0
作者
Mario Ulises Pérez-Zepeda
Carmen García-Peña
María Fernanda Carrillo-Vega
机构
[1] Instituto Nacional de Geriatría,Instituto de Envejecimiento, Facultad de Medicina
[2] Pontificia Universidad Javeriana,undefined
[3] Instituto Nacional de Geriatría,undefined
来源
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research | 2019年 / 31卷
关键词
Frail older adult; Geriatric epidemiology; Biomarkers; Aging;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Frailty has been recognized as a common condition in older adults, however, there is scarce information on the association between frailty and commonly used biomarkers. The aim of this study was to assess the individual and cumulative association of biomarkers with frailty status. This is a cross-sectional analysis of the 2012 wave of the Mexican Health and Aging Study. A sub-sample of 60-year or older adults with anthropometric measurements was analyzed. Frailty was defined with a 31-item frailty index and those considered frail had a score ≥ 0.21. Biomarkers were further categorized as normal/abnormal and tested both one by one and grouped (according to their usual cutoff values). Adjusted logistic models were performed. A total of 1128 older adults were analyzed and their mean age was 69.45 years and 51.24% of them were women. 26.7% (n = 301) were categorized as frail. Individual biomarkers associated with frailty after adjusting for confounding were: hemoglobin [odds ratio (OR) 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13–2.46, p = 0.009], glycated hemoglobin (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.54–2.7, p < 0.001) and vitamin D (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.13–2.07, p = 0.005). Those with ≥ 4 abnormal biomarkers had an independent association with frailty when compared to those without any abnormal biomarker (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.3–5.25, p = 0.005). Aside from the individual associations of specific biomarkers, our findings show that an incremental association of abnormal biomarkers increases the probability of frailty, accounting for the multidimensional nature of frailty and the possible interplay between components of the system that potentiate to give rise to a negative condition such as frailty.
引用
收藏
页码:1429 / 1434
页数:5
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Morley JE(2013)Frailty consensus: a call to action J Am Med Dir Assoc 14 392-397
  • [2] Vellas B(2013)Assessing biological aging: the origin of deficit accumulation Biogerontology 14 709-717
  • [3] Van Kan GA(2015)What are frailty instruments for? Age Ageing 44 545-547
  • [4] Mitnitski A(2006)Research agenda for frailty in older adults: toward a better understanding of physiology and etiology: summary from the American Geriatrics Society/National Institute on Aging Research Conference on Frailty in Older Adults J Am Geriatr Soc 54 991-1001
  • [5] Song X(2015)Risk factors and screening instruments to predict adverse outcomes for undifferentiated older emergency department patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Acad Emerg Med 22 1-21
  • [6] Rockwood K(2002)Looking at the future of geriatric care in developing countries J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 57 M162-M167
  • [7] Rockwood K(2017)A frailty index from common clinical and laboratory tests predicts increased risk of death across the life course GeroScience 39 447-455
  • [8] Theou O(2015)A frailty index based on common laboratory tests in comparison with a clinical frailty index for older adults in long-term care facilities J Am Med Dir Assoc 16 842-847
  • [9] Mitnitski A(2016)Association of low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels with the frailty syndrome in Mexican community-dwelling elderly Aging Male 19 58-63
  • [10] Walston J(2017)The association of vitamin D deficiency and incident frailty in older women: the role of cardiometabolic diseases J Am Geriatr Soc 65 619-624