Self-citation behavior within the health allied professions’ scientific sector in Italy: a bibliometric analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Stefano Vercelli
Leonardo Pellicciari
Andrea Croci
Cesare Maria Cornaggia
Francesca Cecchi
Daniele Piscitelli
机构
[1] Institute of Veruno,Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri
[2] IRCCS,School of Medicine and Surgery
[3] IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine
[4] Private Practice,School of Physical and Occupational Therapy
[5] University of Milano Bicocca,Department of Kinesiology, Doctor of Physical Therapy Program
[6] University of Florence,undefined
[7] McGill University,undefined
[8] University of Connecticut,undefined
来源
Scientometrics | 2023年 / 128卷
关键词
Academic productivity; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; H-index; Physiotherapy; Rehabilitation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
National scientific qualification (NSQ) is a procedure to regulate access to Italian academic positions. An increased use of self-citations could favor the achievement of the minimum bibliometric requirements. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the self-citing behavior of successful candidates who applied for the NSQ in the Allied Health Professions (AHP) scientific field. Bibliometric indexes of all candidates qualified in the three first sessions (2012, 2013, and 2016) were retrieved from the Scopus database. We developed a new index (ΔSCR) to detect changes in the candidate's habits based on the difference between the Self Citation Rate (SCR) in the year preceding NSQ and that of the previous 10 years. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to analyze the ΔSCR between sessions. Multivariate regressions were run to investigate the relationship between ΔSCR and six independent factors. Differences in ΔSCR were found between 2012 and 2013 (p = 0.008), between 2013 and 2016 (p < 0.0001), but not between 2012 and 2016 (p = 1.000). Regressions showed highest R2 in ΔSCR ≥ 10 subsets (2012: R2 = 0.373; 2013: R2 = 0.645; 2016: R2 = 0.511). The difference in citation habits (ΔC) was a significant ΔSCR predictor in 2012 and 2013, while publication habits (ΔP) and the difference in the H-index with vs. without self-citations (ΔH) were significant variables in 2012 and 2016, respectively. In the AHP sector, there was an increase in the use of self-citations in the 2013 session. Higher ΔSCR was associated with ΔC, ΔH and ΔP.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1217
页数:12
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Self-citation behavior within the health allied professions' scientific sector in Italy: a bibliometric analysis
    Vercelli, Stefano
    Pellicciari, Leonardo
    Croci, Andrea
    Cornaggia, Cesare Maria
    Cecchi, Francesca
    Piscitelli, Daniele
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2023, 128 (02) : 1205 - 1217
  • [2] JOURNAL SELF-CITATION RATES AND IMPACT FACTORS IN DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY, AND MEDICINE: A 3-YEAR BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS
    Livas, Christos
    Delli, Konstantina
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2018, 18 (04) : 269 - 274
  • [3] The Hirsch-index in self-citation rates with articles in Medicine (Baltimore) Bibliometric analysis of publications in two stages from 2018 to 2021
    Liu, Mei-Yuan
    Chien, Tsair-Wei
    Chou, Willy
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (45) : E31609