Cinnarizine in refractory migraine prophylaxis: efficacy and tolerability. A comparison with sodium valproate

被引:0
作者
Togha Mansoureh
Masoud Rahmat Jirde
Kiafar Nilavari
Hosein Ashrafian
Soodeh Razeghi
Leila Kohan
机构
[1] Medical Sciences/University of Tehran,Department of Neurology
[2] Sina Hospital,Department of Neurology
[3] Gorgan University of Medical Sciences,undefined
来源
The Journal of Headache and Pain | 2008年 / 9卷
关键词
Migraine prophylaxis; Cinnarizine; Sodium valproate;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This was a double-blind clinical trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the cinnarizine (CIN) in patients with migraine who were refractory to propranolol and tricyclic antidepressants in comparison with sodium valproate (SV) to investigate whether CIN could be at least as effective as SV. A total of 125 patients were treated in a treatment period of 12 weeks. All patients had at least one intake of trial medication and 2-week post baseline efficacy observation which all were included in the ITT analysis. Of the 125 subjects treated, 46 discontinued prematurely: 25 from the CIN and 21 from the SV group. The main reasons for premature discontinuation were: lost to follow up (25/46, 63.2%), insufficient response (16/46, 20%), and adverse events (5/46, 12.8%). No statistically significant inter-group differences in the number of discontinuation was observed (p > 0.05). In both groups, number of attacks, intensity, and duration of attacks significantly decreased (p < 0.05). No statistically significant inter-group differences were observed regarding the mean number of attacks, duration, and intensity of migraine attacks for any of the time intervals analysed, except for the mean reduction of third and fourth visits intensity from baseline which were significantly different in two groups (p < 0.05), with the CIN group showing more reduction. Analysis of the number of responders showed that in the CIN group 61.2% subjects were responders, and 63.8% in the SV group. No statistically significant differences between the treatment groups were found for any of the secondary parameters. Overall 26 subjects reported one or more adverse events during the study period: 13 subjects in each group. Five subjects discontinued prematurely due to adverse events; two in the CIN group with significant weight gain, and 3 in the SV group with significant weight gain and severe tremor. These results suggest that CIN is an effective and safe prophylactic agent even in severe migraine headache.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 82
页数:5
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Lipton RB(2001)Prevalence and duration of migraine in the United States: data from American Migraine Study II? Headache 41 646-657
[2]  
Stewart WF(2004)Topiramate for migraine prevention: a randomized controlled trial JAMA 291 265-273
[3]  
Diamond S(2002)A quantification of the placebo response in migraine prophylaxis Cephalalgia 22 265-270
[4]  
Diamond ML(2002)Migraine current understanding and treatment N Eng J Med 346 257-270
[5]  
Reed M(2000)Practice parameters: evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache (an evidence-based review): report of the quality standard subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Neurology 55 754-762
[6]  
Brandes JL(2001)Characterization of voltage-gated calcium currents in freshly isolated smooth muscle cells from rat tail main artery Acta Physiol Scand 173 257-265
[7]  
Saper JR(2004)Inhibition of voltage-gated calcium currents in type II vestibular hair cells by cinnarizine Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 369 570-575
[8]  
Diamond M(2002)New approaches to the management of peripheral vertigo: efficacy and safety of two calcium antagonists in a 12-week, multinational, double-blind study Otol Neurotol 23 357-363
[9]  
Couch JR(1993)Guidelines and recommendations for the treatment of migraine Func Neurol 8 441-446
[10]  
Lewis DW(1999)Linee guida e raccomandazioni per il trattamento dell’emicrania. II Edizione Confinia Cephalalgica 8 73-78