Rawls’s difference principle and maximin rule of allocation: a new analysis

被引:0
作者
Philippe Mongin
Marcus Pivato
机构
[1] CNRS & HEC Paris,
[2] LEMMA,undefined
[3] Université Paris II Panthéon-Assas,undefined
[4] Labex MME-DII,undefined
[5] THEMA,undefined
[6] CY Cergy-Paris Université,undefined
来源
Economic Theory | 2021年 / 71卷
关键词
Rawls; Maximin; Difference principle; Ex ante egalitarian; Ex post egalitarian; Min-of-means; D63; D71; D81; I30;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
If Rawls’s A Theory of Justice has achieved fame among economists, this is due to his Difference Principle, which says that inequalities of resources should be to the benefit of the less fortunate, or more operationally, that allocations of resources should be ranked by the maximin criterion. We extend the Rawlsian maximin in two ways: first, by resorting to the more general min-of-means formula of decision theory, second, by addressing the case where the resources accruing to each individual are uncertain to society. For the latter purpose, we resort to the ex ante versus ex post distinction of welfare economics. The paper axiomatically characterizes the ex ante and ex post forms of the Rawlsian maximin and compares them in terms of egalitarian criteria. It finally recommends and axiomatizes a compromise egalitarian theory that mixes the two forms.
引用
收藏
页码:1499 / 1525
页数:26
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Adler MD(2006)Inequality and uncertainty: theory and legal applications Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 155 279-377
  • [2] Sanchirico CW(1974)Social evaluation through notional choice Quart. J. Econ. 88 597-624
  • [3] Alexander S(2016)Utilitarian preferences with multiple priors Econometrica 84 1181-1201
  • [4] Alon S(1973)Some ordinalist-utilitarian notes on Rawls’ Theory of Justice J. Philos. 70 245-263
  • [5] Gayer G(1988)Maximin, leximin, and the protective criterion: characterizations and comparisons J. Econ. Theory 46 34-44
  • [6] Arrow K(1997)On the measurement of inequality under uncertainty J. Econ. Theory 75 194-204
  • [7] Barberà S(2008)Optimal marginal and average income taxation under maximin J. Econ. Theory 143 425-441
  • [8] Jackson M(2013)A characterization of maximin Econ. Theory Bull. 1 151-156
  • [9] Ben-Porath E(2019)Aggregation of Bayesian preferences: unanimity vs monotonicity Soc. Choice Welfare 52 419-451
  • [10] Gilboa I(2011)Aggregation of multiple prior opinions J. Econ. Theory 146 2563-2582