An exploration of the demand limit for flex-route as feeder transit services: a case study in Salt Lake City

被引:22
作者
Qiu F. [1 ,2 ]
Li W. [3 ]
Haghani A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic, Southeast University, No.2 Sipailou, Nanjing, 210096, Jiangsu
[2] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Engineering Laboratory Bldg Room 0147C, College Park, 20740, MD
[3] School of Transportation, Southeast University, No.2 Sipailou, Nanjing, 210096, Jiangsu
[4] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, 1173 Glenn L. Martin Hall, College Park, 20742, MD
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Feeder transit; Flex-route transit; Transportation planning; Uncertain demand;
D O I
10.1007/s12469-014-0097-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As an innovative combination of fixed-route transit and demand responsive service, a flex-route operating policy had been introduced into feeder transit services. In this paper, a system cost function, combining vehicle operation cost and transit customer cost, is constructed as the performance measure to explore the feasibility of replacing the fixed-route policy with a flex-route policy in feeder transit systems, without disturbing the existing coordination between the major transit and feeder service. The Route F94 flex-route feeder system in Salt Lake City which connects with UTA TRAX Blue Rail Line is chosen for the analysis. The upper bound of demand for implementing the flex-route policy in this feeder service is derived. The results indicate that the Route F94 flex-route feeder system is still likely to have a distinct system advantage in operating environments with occasional request rejections, in comparison with the fixed-route service. As a result of our findings, it is possible to substantially expand the application of the flex-route policy in the feeder transit market. © 2014, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 276
页数:17
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Alshalalfah B., Shalaby A., Sensitivity of flex-route transit service to design and schedule-building characteristics, Presented at 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, (2008)
  • [2] Alshalalfah B., Shalaby A., Development of important relationships for the planning of flex-route transit services, Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, (2010)
  • [3] Alshalalfah B., Shalaby A., Feasibility of flex-route as a feeder transit service to rail stations in the suburbs: case study in Toronto, J Urban Plan D-ASCE, 138, 1, pp. 90-100, (2012)
  • [4] Daganzo C.F., Checkpoint Dial-a-ride Systems, Transp Res Part B, 18, 4-5, pp. 315-327, (1984)
  • [5] Fu L., On-line and off-line routing and scheduling of dial-a-ride paratransit vehicles, Comput-Aided Civ Inf, 14, pp. 309-319, (1999)
  • [6] Fu L., Planning and design of flex-route transit services, Transp Res Rec, 1791, pp. 59-66, (2002)
  • [7] Horn M.E.T., Multi-modal and demand-responsive passenger transport systems: a modeling framework with embedded control systems, Transp Res Part A, 36, 2, pp. 167-188, (2002)
  • [8] Horn M.E.T., Fleet scheduling and dispatching for demand-responsive passenger services, Transp Res Part C, 10, pp. 35-63, (2002)
  • [9] Koffman D., TCRP report 53: operational experiences with flexible transit services: a synthesis of transit practice, (2004)
  • [10] Li X., Quadrifoglio L., Feeder transit services: choosing between fixed and demand responsive policy, Transp Res Part C, 18, 5, pp. 770-780, (2010)