Weed management in organic cereals: Advances and opportunities

被引:33
作者
Kolb L.N. [1 ,2 ]
Gallandt E.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sustainable Agriculture Program, Department of Plant, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME
[2] Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742
关键词
Barley; Crop-weed competition; Organic production; Physical weed control; Wheat;
D O I
10.1007/s13165-012-0022-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cereals are among the most competitive of crops, but under organic management, weeds remain the foremost production problem. Understanding the ecology of both weeds and cereals is paramount to developing non-chemical strategies that limit yield loss due to weeds whilst suppressing weed growth and weed seed deposition. Key mechanisms for weed management include enhancing the cereal crops' competitive advantage through practices that (1) reduce weed density, e.g. through use of a 'false seedbed', and cultivation, possibly though the use of selective weed control with inter-row cultivation, and (2) increase interspecific competition, including increased seeding rates, precise fertilizer placement, and promoting quick canopy closure. The challenge is to find combinations of weed management tactics that simultaneously provide acceptable levels of weed control, reduce weed seed return to the seed bank, are economically advantageous, and can overcome variability in weather. Presently, the best options for in-season weed management in organic cereals are increasing the seeding rate or the comparatively less common use of inter-row cultivation for selective weed control. As cultivation technology improves, increasing accuracy and bringing down costs, this practice may become more widely adopted. Further research should focus on identifying practices that maximize net returns and weed suppression whilst being cognizant of potential interactions with other pests, organic production issues, and weed management tactics. These efforts should also provide insight to the efficacy of potential strategies in the larger context of the farming system as parameters including the size of the weed seed bank will dictate what practices are likely to be successful. © 2012 Springer Science & Business Media BV.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 42
页数:19
相关论文
共 184 条
[81]  
Koscelny J.A., Peeper T.F., Solie J.B., Solomon Jr. S.G., Effect of wheat (Triticum aestivum) row spacing, seeding rate, and cultivar on yield loss from cheat (Bromus secalinus), Weed Technol, 4, 3, pp. 487-492, (1990)
[82]  
Koscelny J.A., Peeper T.F., Solie J.B., Solomon Jr. S.G., Seeding date, seeding rate, and row spacing affect wheat (Triticum aestivum) and cheat (Bromus secalinus), Weed Technol, 5, 4, pp. 707-712, (1991)
[83]  
Kouwenhoven J.K., Intra-row mechanical weed control-possibilities and problems, Soil Tillage Res, 41, 1-2, pp. 87-104, (1997)
[84]  
Kristensen L., Olsen J., Weiner J., Crop density, sowing pattern, and nitrogen fertilization effects on weed suppression and yield in spring wheat, Weed Sci, 56, 1, pp. 97-102, (2008)
[85]  
Kurstjens D.A.G., Kropff M.J., The impact of uprooting and soil-covering on the effectiveness of weed harrowing, Weed Res, 41, 3, pp. 211-228, (2001)
[86]  
Kurstjens D.A.G., Perdok U.D., Goense D., Selective uprooting by weed harrowing on sandy soils, Weed Res, 40, 5, pp. 431-447, (2000)
[87]  
Lafond G.P., Effects of row spacing, seeding rate and nitrogen on yield of barley and wheat under zero-till management, Can J Plant Sci, 74, 4, pp. 703-711, (1994)
[88]  
Lafond G.P., Baker R.J., Effects of genotype and seed size on speed of emergence and seedling vigor in 9 spring wheat cultivars, Crop Sci, 26, 2, pp. 341-346, (1986)
[89]  
Lal R., Mechanized tillage systems effects on soil erosion from an alfisol in watersheds cropped to maize, Soil Tillage Res, 4, 4, pp. 349-360, (1984)
[90]  
Lammerts van Bueren E.T., Struik P.C., Jacobsen E., Ecological concepts in organic farming and their consequences for an organic crop ideotype, NJAS - Wageningen J Life Sci, 50, 1, pp. 1-26, (2002)