Complexity, Hypersets, and the Ecological Perspective on Perception-Action

被引:51
作者
Chemero A. [1 ]
Turvey M.T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Scientific and Philosophical Studies of Mind Program, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA
[2] Center for the Ecological Study of Perception and Action, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
关键词
affordance; Brusselator; complexity; ecological psychology; hyperset; James J. Gibson; Robert Rosen;
D O I
10.1162/biot.2007.2.1.23
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The ecological approach to perception-action is unlike the standard approach in several respects. It takes the animal-in-its-environment as the proper scale for the theory and analysis of perception-action, it eschews symbol based accounts of perception-action, it promotes self-organization as the theory-constitutive metaphor for perception-action, and it employs self-referring, non-predicative definitions in explaining perception-action. The present article details the complexity issues confronted by the ecological approach in terms suggested by Rosen and introduces non-well-founded set theory (hyperset theory) as a potentially useful tool for expressing them. The issues and the tool are brought to focus in the concept of affordance that is the basis for explanation of prospective control of action in the ecological approach. © 2007, Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 36
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Aczel P., Non-well-founded Sets, (1988)
[2]  
Barwise J., Etchemendy J., The Liar: An Essay on Truth and Circularity, (1987)
[3]  
Barwise J., Moss L., Vicious Circles, (1996)
[4]  
Boden M.A., Is metabolism necessary?, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 50, pp. 231-248, (1999)
[5]  
Boden M.A., Autopoiesis and life, Cognitive Science Quarterly, 1, pp. 117-145, (2000)
[6]  
Bunge M., Treatise on Basic Philosophy, (1977)
[7]  
Chemero A., Radical empiricism through the ages, Contemporary Psychology, 48, pp. 18-20, (2003)
[8]  
Chemero A., An outline of a theory of affordances, Ecological Psychology, 15, pp. 181-195, (2003)
[9]  
Cummins R., Functional analysis, Journal of Philosophy, 72, pp. 741-765, (1975)
[10]  
Feferman S., Turing in the land of 0(z), The Universal Turing Machine: A Half-century Survey, pp. 113-147, (1988)