Uniqueness, Rationality, and the Norm of Belief

被引:0
作者
Nick Hughes
机构
[1] University College Dublin,
来源
Erkenntnis | 2019年 / 84卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
I argue that it is epistemically permissible to believe that P when it is epistemically rational to believe that P. Unlike previous defenses of this claim, this argument is not vulnerable to the claim that permissibility is being confused with excusability.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 75
页数:18
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Boghossian P(2003)The normativity of content Philosophical Issues 13 31-45
[2]  
Cohen S(1984)Justification and truth Philosophical Studies 46 279-295
[3]  
DeRose K(2002)Assertion, knowledge, and context Philosophical Review 111 167-203
[4]  
Friedman J(2013)Suspended judgment Philosophical Studies 162 165-181
[5]  
Lackey J(2007)Norms of assertion Nous 41 594-626
[6]  
Lasonen-Aarnio M(2010)Unreasonable knowledge Philosophical Perspectives 24 1-21
[7]  
Littlejohn C(2013)The Russellian Retreat Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 293-320
[8]  
Moss S(2014)Epistemology formalized Philosophical Review 122 1-43
[9]  
Railton P(1994)Truth, reason, and the regulation of belief Philosophical Issues. 5 71-93
[10]  
Rosen G(2001)Nominalism, naturalism, epistemic relativism Philosophical Perspectives 15 60-91