Ethical issues in biomedical research using electronic health records: a systematic review

被引:0
作者
Jan Piasecki
Ewa Walkiewicz-Żarek
Justyna Figas-Skrzypulec
Anna Kordecka
Vilius Dranseika
机构
[1] Jagiellonian University,Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical College
[2] HTA Registry Sp. z o.o. Sp. K,Institute of Philosophy
[3] Fundacja Optimum Pareto (Optimum Pareto Foundation),undefined
[4] Vilnius University,undefined
来源
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | 2021年 / 24卷
关键词
Electronic health records; Learning healthcare system; Embedded research; Ethics; consent; Systematic review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Digitization of a health record changes its accessibility. An electronic health record (EHR) can be accessed by multiple authorized users. Health information from EHRs contributes to learning healthcare systems’ development. The objective of this systematic review is to answer a question: What are ethical issues concerning research using EHRs in the literature? We searched Medline Ovid, Embase and Scopus for publications concerning ethical issues of research use of EHRs. We employed the constant comparative method to retrieve common ethical themes. We descriptively summarized empirical studies. The study reveals the breadth, depth, and complexity of ethical problems associated with research use of EHRs. The central ethical question that emerges from the review is how to manage access to EHRs. Managing accessibility consists of interconnected and overlapping issues: streamlining research access to EHRs, minimizing risk, engaging and educating patients, as well as ensuring trustworthy governance of EHR data. Most of the ethical problems concerning EHR-based research arise from rapid cultural change. The framing of concepts of privacy, as well as individual and public dimensions of beneficence, are changing. We are currently living in the middle of this transition period. Human emotions and mental habits, as well as laws, are lagging behind technological developments. In the medical tradition, individual patient’s health has always been in the center. Transformation of healthcare care, its digitalization, seems to have some impacts on our perspective of health care ethics, research ethics and public health ethics.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 658
页数:25
相关论文
共 171 条
[1]  
Aicardi C(2016)Emerging ethical issues regarding digital health data. On the World Medical Association Draft Declaration on Ethical Considerations Regarding Health Databases and Biobanks Croatian Medical Journal 57 207-213
[2]  
Del Savio L(2016)Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies BMC Medical Ethics 17 73-409
[3]  
Dove ES(2002)Purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews Quality & Quantity 36 391-213
[4]  
Lucivero F(2014)Public attitudes regarding the use of electronic health information and residual clinical tissues for research Journal of Community Genetics 5 205-112
[5]  
Tempini N(2017)The impact of the EU general data protection regulation on scientific research E-Cancer Medical Science 11 709-232
[6]  
Prainsack B(2012)Patients’ views about the use of their personal information from general practice medical records in health research: A qualitative study in Ireland Family Practice 30 105-16
[7]  
Aitken M(2018)HIPAA and protecting health information in the 21st Century JAMA 320 231-11
[8]  
de St Jorre J(2001)Justice, health and healthcare The American Journal of Bioethics 1 2-130
[9]  
Pagliari C(2017)Reframing consent for clinical research: A function-based approach The American Journal of Bioethics 17 3-61
[10]  
Jepson R(2000)Constant comparison method: A kaleidoscope of data The Qualitative Report 4 1-27