Cultural communication learning environment in science classes

被引:0
作者
Dhindsa H.S. [1 ]
Abdul-Latif S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Science Education, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan
关键词
Biology; Brunei; Communication; Culture; Learning environment; Secondary science;
D O I
10.1007/s10984-012-9097-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Classroom communication often involves interactions between students and teachers from dissimilar cultures, which influence classroom learning because of their dissimilar communication styles influenced by their cultures. It is therefore important to study the influence of culture on classroom communication that influences the classroom verbal and nonverbal interactions. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a new instrument to assess eight scales of students' classroom communication learning environment: Body Language, Communication Rate, Communication Loudness, Eye Contact, English Usage, Verbal Support, Intra-gender Communication and Inter-gender Communication. The instrument was administered to 1,723 upper-secondary biology students in Brunei government schools. The alpha reliability (0. 58-0. 91) and discrimination validity (0. 08-0. 13) coefficients for these scales were within acceptable ranges. Statistically significant η 2 coefficients suggested that the instrument was able to differentiate between participating biology classes. Students perceived a low level verbal support and sometimes higher teacher communication rate in their classes. Dialects other than English, which is the medium of instruction, have been used in biology classes to some extent. There is a strong tendency for intra-gender than inter-gender communications in classes, which could limit the effectiveness of teaching and learning in constructivist classes © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 63
页数:26
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] Aiken L.R., Update on attitudes and other affective variables in learning mathematics, Review of Educational Research, 46, pp. 293-311, (1976)
  • [2] Aikenhead G.S., Towards a First Nations cross-cultural science and technology curriculum, Culture and Comparative Studies, 81, pp. 217-238, (1997)
  • [3] Aikenhead G.S., Processes of science, (1998)
  • [4] Albert R.D., Latinos in the United States: Diversity, cultural patterns, and misconceptions, Civic Discourse: Multiculturalism, Cultural Diversity, and Global Communication, pp. 157-175, (1998)
  • [5] Anderson O.R., Quantitative Analysis of Structure in Leaching, (1971)
  • [6] Argyle M., Salter V., Nicholson H., Williams M., Burgess P., The communication of inferior and superior attitudes by verbal and non-verbal signals, British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, pp. 222-231, (1970)
  • [7] Atwater M.M., Social constructivism: Infusion into multicultural science education research agenda, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, pp. 821-837, (1996)
  • [8] Banks J.A., Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals, Multicultural Education: Issues and Perspectives, pp. 189-207, (1997)
  • [9] Beall A.E., Reading the Hidden Communications around You: A Guide to Reading Body Language in the Workplace, (2009)
  • [10] Blatner A., About nonverbal communications, (2009)