The reasons of general practitioners for promoting colorectal cancer mass screening in France

被引：21

作者：

Berchi C. ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Dupuis J.-M. ^{[2
]}

Launoy G. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] ERI 3 Cancers and Populations, Equipe Soutenue Par l'Inserm et la Région, Faculté de Médecine, Caen Cedex

[2] Groupe d'Économie Mathématique et Microéconomie Appliquée, Université de Caen

[3] ERI3 INSERM Cancers and Populations, Caen

来源：

The European Journal of Health Economics | 2006年 / 7卷 / 2期

关键词：

Colorectal cancer; Discrete choice models; General practitioners' preferences; Mass screening;

D O I：

10.1007/s10198-006-0339-0

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Implementation of colorectal cancer (CRC) mass screening is a public health priority. Obtaining the involvement of general practitioners (GPs) is crucial for ensuring participation by the general public. This study elicited GPs' reasons for promoting CRC screening. The method used was discrete choice modeling. Questionnaires with a set of pairs of hypothetical screening scenarios were sent to 700 GPs. Factors influencing GPs' screening practice were found to be: the effectiveness of the screening program, the proportion of false negatives and false positives, and their remuneration. Hence improving screening test sensitivity and setting up specific remuneration for conducting screening would help to increase GPs' participation in CRC screening in France. © 2006 Springer Medizin Verlag.

引用

页码：91 / 98

页数：7

共 32 条

[1]

Abelson J., Lomas J., Do health service organizations and community health centres have higher disease prevention and health promotion levels than fee-for-service practices?, Can Med Assoc J, 142, pp. 575-581, (1990)

[2]

Allison J.E., Tekawa I.S., Ransom L.J., Adrain A.L., A comparison of fecal occult-blood tests for colorectal cancer screening, N Engl J Med, 334, pp. 155-159, (1996)

[3]

Berchi C., Bouvier V., Reaud J.M., Launoy G., Cost-effectiveness analysis of two strategies for mass screening for colorectal cancer in France, Health Econ, 13, pp. 227-238, (2004)

[4]

Cairns J., Van Der Pol M., Lloyd A., Decision making heuristics and the elicitation of preferences: Being fast and frugal about the future, Health Econ, 11, pp. 655-658, (2002)

[5]

Castiglione G., Sala P., Ciatto S., Grazzini G., Mazzota A., Rossetti C., Et al., Comparative analysis of results of guaiac and immunochemical tests for faecal occult blood in colorectal cancer screening in two oncological institutions, Eur J Cancer Prev, 3, pp. 399-405, (1994)

[6]

Cole S.R., Young G.P., Byrne D., Guy J.R., Morcom J., Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner, J Med Screen, 9, pp. 147-152, (2002)

[7]

Drakopoulos S.A., Hierarchical choice in economics, J Econ Surv, 8, pp. 133-153, (1994)

[8]

Faivre J., Arveux P., Milan C., Durand G., Lamour J., Bedenne L., Participation in mass screening for colorectal cancer: Results of screening and rescreening from the Burgundy study, Eur J Cancer Prev, 1, pp. 49-55, (1991)

[9]

Farrar S., Ryan M., Response ordering effects: A methodological issue in conjoint analysis, Health Econ, 8, pp. 75-79, (1999)

[10]

Farrar S., Ryan M., Ross D., Ludbrook A., Using discrete choice modelling in priority setting: An application to clinical service developments, Soc Sci Med, 50, pp. 63-75, (2000)

← 1 2 3 4 →