Modified Work and Return to Work: A Review of the Literature

被引:0
作者
Niklas Krause
Lisa K. Dasinger
Frank Neuhauser
机构
[1] University of California,School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology
[2] Public Health Institute,undefined
[3] UC Data,undefined
[4] University of California,undefined
来源
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | 1998年 / 8卷
关键词
disability; rehabilitation; reemployment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Workplace injuries which result in lost time from work can have considerable financial repercussions for employer and employee alike, not to mention their physical and emotional impact on the employee. In order to lessen workers' compensation costs and facilitate the rehabilitation process, some employers offer modified work to their injured employees in order to allow an earlier return to work than would ordinarily be possible. Although modified work is regarded by many as a cornerstone in the job rehabilitation process, little is known about the structure, effectiveness, and efficiency of such programs. This report is a systematic review of the scientific literature on modified work published since 1975. Its objective is to synthesize and critically appraise the research on modified work, and, specifically, to assess the effectiveness of modified work programs. Using a systematic keyword search in three online libraries, 29 empirical studies of modified work programs were selected for review. The studies were evaluated for methodological quality, from which 13 higher quality studies were identified. On the basis of these 13 studies, the effectiveness of modified work programs was evaluated. The main finding of this review is that modified work programs facilitate return to work for temporarily and permanently disabled workers. Injured workers who are offered modified work return to work about twice as often as those who are not. Similarly, modified work programs cut the number of lost work days in half. The available evidence also suggests that modified work programs are cost-effective. Comprehensive cost-benefit analyses are needed to confirm this finding.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 139
页数:26
相关论文
共 202 条
[1]  
Krause N(1994)Occupational disability due to low back pain: A new interdisciplinary classification based on a phase model of disability Spine 19 1011-1020
[2]  
Ragland DR.(1995)Randomized controlled trials in industrial low back pain relating to return to work. Part 1. Acute interventions Arch Phys Med Rehab 76 966-973
[3]  
Scheer SJ(1987)The cost of disability Clin Orthop 221 77-84
[4]  
Radack KL(1988)The costs of back pain in industry Occup Med 3 1-5
[5]  
O'Brien DRJ.(1987)Quantitative methods in the review of epidemiologic literature Epidemiol Rev 9 1-30
[6]  
Snook SH(1988)Meta-analysis. A quantitative approach to research integration JAMA 259 1685-1689
[7]  
Webster BS.(1994)Users' guide to the medical literature: VI. How to use an overview JAMA 272 1367-1371
[8]  
Snook SH.(1989)Cardiovascular diseases and the work environment. A critical review of the epidemiologic literature on chemical factors [see comments] Scand J Work Environ Health 15 245-264
[9]  
Greenland S.(1995)Managing work disability: Why first return to work is not a measure of success Indust Labor Relat Rev 48 452-469
[10]  
Thacker SB.(1991)Identifying patients at risk of becoming disabled because of low-back pain. The Vermont Rehabilitation Engineering Center predictive model Spine 16 605-607