Mandibular Reconstruction: Overview

被引:194
作者
Kumar B.P. [1 ]
Venkatesh V. [1 ]
Kumar K.A.J. [1 ]
Yadav B.Y. [1 ]
Mohan S.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Sreepuram, Narketpally, Nalgonda, 508254, Andhra Pradesh
关键词
Bone substitutes; Implants; Mandibular reconstruction; Vascularized and non vascularized bone grafts;
D O I
10.1007/s12663-015-0766-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Mandibular reconstruction has changed significantly over the years and continues to evolve with the introduction of newer technologies and techniques. Purpose: This article reviews the history of oromandibular reconstruction, biomechanics of mandible, summarizes the reconstruction options available for mandible with defect classification, goals in reconstruction, the various donor sites, current reconstructive options, dental rehabilitation and persistent associated problems. Summary: Oromandibular reconstruction, although a challenge for the head and neck reconstructive surgeon, is now reliable and highly successful with excellent long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes with the use of autogenous bone grafts and current reconstructive options. The ideal reconstruction would provide a solid arch to articulate with the upper jaw, restoring swallowing speech, mastication, and esthetics. Autogenous vascularized bone grafts in combination with microsurgical techniques have revolutionized mandibular reconstruction in oral cancer surgery. Current trends in mandibular reconstruction aim to achieve reestablishment of a viable mandible of proper form and maxillary mandibular relationship while decreasing the need for invasive autogenous graft procurement. However the optimal reconstruction of mandibular defects is still controversial in regards to reconstructive options which include the donor site selection, timing of surgery and method of reconstruction. © 2015, The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 441
页数:16
相关论文
共 142 条
[61]  
Cheung L.K., Samman N., Chow T.W., Clark R.K.F., Tideman H., A bone graft condensing syringe system for maxillofacial reconstructive surgery, Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 35, pp. 267-270, (1997)
[62]  
Kinoshita Y., Kobayashi M., Hidaka T., Ikada Y., Reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects in dogs using poly (l-lactide) mesh and autogenic particulate cancellous bone and marrow: preliminary report, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 55, 7, pp. 718-723, (1997)
[63]  
Louis P., Holmes J., Fernandes R., Resorbable mesh as a containment system in reconstruction of the atrophic mandible fracture, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 62, 6, pp. 719-723, (2004)
[64]  
Takagi S., Chow L.C., Markovic M., Friedman C.D., Costantino P.D., Morphological and phase characterizations of retrieved calcium phosphate cement implants, J Biomed Mater Res, 58, 1, pp. 36-41, (2001)
[65]  
Samman N., Cheung L.K., Tideman H., Functional reconstruction of the jaws: new concepts, Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg, 13, pp. 184-192, (1996)
[66]  
Tideman H., Samman N., Cheung L.K., Functional reconstruction of the mandible: a modified titanium mesh system, Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 27, 5, pp. 339-345, (1998)
[67]  
Warnke P.H., Springer I.N., Wiltfang J., Acil Y., Eufinger H., Wehmoller M., Russo P.A., Bolte H., Sherry E., Behrens E., Terheyden H., Growth and transplantation of a custom vascularised bone graft in a man, Lancet, 364, 9436, pp. 766-770, (2004)
[68]  
Celeste A.J., Iannazzi J.A., Taylor R.C., Hewick R.M., Rosen V., Wang E.A., Wozney J.M., Identification of transforming growth factor beta family members present in bone-inductive protein purified from bovine bone, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 87, 24, pp. 9843-9847, (1990)
[69]  
Moghadam H.G., Urist M.R., Sandor G.K., Clokie C.M., Successful mandibular reconstruction using a BMP bioimplant, J Craniofac Surg, 12, 2, pp. 119-127, (2001)
[70]  
Herford A.S., Boyne P.J., Reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects with bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2), J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 66, 4, pp. 616-624, (2008)