Tissue attachment strength of prosthetic meshes used in ventral and incisional hernia repair

被引:0
作者
K.A. LeBlanc
D. Bellanger
K.V. Rhynes
D.G. Baker
R.W. Stout
机构
[1] Surgical Specialty Group,
[2] Medical Plaza,undefined
[3] Suite 612,undefined
[4] 7777 Hennessy Boulevard,undefined
[5] Suite 612,undefined
[6] Baton Rouge,undefined
[7] LA 70808,undefined
[8] USA,undefined
[9] Department of Surgery,undefined
[10] Louisiana State University,undefined
[11] New Orleans,undefined
[12] LA,undefined
[13] USA,undefined
[14] Division of Laboratory Animal Medicine,undefined
[15] Louisiana State University School of Veterinary Medicine,undefined
[16] Room 1502,undefined
[17] Skip Bertman Drive,undefined
[18] Baton Rouge,undefined
[19] LA 70803,undefined
[20] USA,undefined
来源
Surgical Endoscopy | 2002年 / 16卷
关键词
Hernia Repair; Ventral Hernia Repair; Abdominal Wall Defect; Incisional Hernia Repair; Prosthetic Mesh;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Many prosthetic materials are used in incisional hernia repair, including polypropylene (PP) and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE). However, PP forms severe adhesions and ePTFE has raised concerns about the adequacy of tissue attachment. Methods: The early tissue attachment strength of PP and two new forms of ePTFE (DLM and DLMC) was compared in a rabbit model (n = 12) in which disks of the three meshes (n = 8 of each material) were implanted against the abdominal wall for 3 days. Results: Tensiometer testing found that DLMC mesh had significantly greater attachment strength than PP (p = 0.02). Histologic studies indicated that this was due to cellular ingrowth. Tissue adhesions were observed with all eight PP disks, one DLMC disk, and none of the DLM disks. Conclusion: Modified forms of ePTFE mesh may provide abdominal wall repairs that are as strong or stronger than those obtained with PP, with early tissue attachment and without adhesions.
引用
收藏
页码:1542 / 1546
页数:4
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据