Multiple Streams Approach to Tobacco Control Policymaking in a Tobacco-Growing State

被引:0
作者
Hadii M. Mamudu
Sumati Dadkar
Sreenivas P. Veeranki
Yi He
Richard Barnes
Stanton A. Glantz
机构
[1] East Tennessee State University,Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health
[2] Vanderbilt University School of Medicine,Department of Pediatrics
[3] East Tennessee State University,Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, College of Public Health
[4] University of California,Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education
[5] San Francisco,undefined
来源
Journal of Community Health | 2014年 / 39卷
关键词
Tennessee; Smokefree policy; Tobacco-producing state; Multiple streams model; Smokefree coalition;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Smokefree policies (SFPs) have diffused throughout the US and worldwide. However, the development of SFPs in the difficult policy environment of tobacco-producing states and economies worldwide has not been well-explored. In 2007, Tennessee, the third largest tobacco producer in the US, enacted the Non-Smoker Protection Act (NSPA). This study utilizes the multiple streams model to provide understanding of why and how this policy was developed by triangulating interviews with key stakeholders and legislative debates with archival documents. In June 2006, the Governor unexpectedly announced support for SFP, which created a window of opportunity for policy change. The Campaign for Healthy and Responsible Tennessee, a health coalition, seized this opportunity and worked with the administration and the Tennessee Restaurant Association to negotiate a comprehensive SFP, however, a weaker bill was used by the legislative leadership to develop the NSPA. Although the Governor and the Tennessee Restaurant Association’s support generated an environment for 100 % SFP, health groups did not fully capitalize on this environmental change and settled for a weak policy with several exemptions. This study suggests the importance for proponents of policy change to understand changes in their environment and be willing and able to capitalize on these changes.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 645
页数:12
相关论文
共 139 条
[1]  
Mamudu HM(2013)Tennessee’s smokefree policy: It’s time for local control Tennessee Medicine 106 37-41
[2]  
Veeranki SP(2004)Reduced incidence of admissions for myocardial infarction associated with public smoking ban: Before and after study British Medical Journal 328 977-980
[3]  
Sargent RP(2011)Smoke-free air laws and asthma prevalence, symptoms, and severity among nonsmoking youth Pediatrics 127 102-109
[4]  
Shepard RM(2000)Association between household and workplace smoking restrictions and adolescent smoking Journal of American Medical Association 284 717-722
[5]  
Glantz SA(2000)Effect of restriction on smoking at home, at school, and in public places on teenage smoking: Cross-sectional study British Medical Journal 321 333-337
[6]  
Dove MS(2007)Economic effect of a smoke-free law in a tobacco-growing community Tobacco Control 16 66-68
[7]  
Dockery DW(2003)Review of the quality of studies on economic effects of smoke-free policies on hospitality industry Tobacco Control 12 13-20
[8]  
Connolly GN(2010)Smokefree legislation: A review of health and economic outcomes research American Journal of Preventive Medicine 39 S66-S76
[9]  
Farkas A. J.(2010)Smoke-free law associated with higher-than-expected taxable retail sales for bars and taverns in Washington State Prevention of Chronic Disease 7 A79-12
[10]  
Gilpin E. A.(2005)Smoke-free law did not affect revenue from gaming in Delaware Tobacco Control 14 10-636