Adding country resolution to EXIOBASE: impacts on land use embodied in trade

被引:29
作者
Bjelle E.L. [1 ]
Többen J. [1 ]
Stadler K. [1 ]
Kastner T. [2 ,3 ]
Theurl M.C. [2 ]
Erb K.-H. [2 ]
Olsen K.-S. [1 ]
Wiebe K.S. [1 ,4 ]
Wood R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Industrial Ecology Programme, Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim
[2] Institute of Social Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Vienna
[3] Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBIK-F), Frankfurt Am Main
[4] SINTEF Industry, Trondheim
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Country resolution; EXIOBASE; Land footprints; Land use embodied in trade; Multiregional input–output analysis; Regional aggregation; Rest-of-the-world regions;
D O I
10.1186/s40008-020-0182-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Multiregional input–output (MRIO) databases are used to analyze the impact of resource use and environmental impacts along global supply chains. To accurately account for pressures and impacts that are highly concentrated in specific sectors or regions of the world, such as agricultural and land-use-related impacts, MRIO databases are being fueled by increasingly more detailed data. To date no MRIO database exists which couples a high level of harmonized sector detail with high country resolution. Currently available databases either aggregate minor countries into rest-of-the-world (WIOD and EXIOBASE 3), or the high country resolution is achieved at the cost of non-harmonized or lower sectoral detail (Eora, OECD-ICIO or the GTAP-MRIO). This aggregation can cause potentially significant differences in environmental and socioeconomic impact calculations. In this paper, we describe the development of an EXIOBASE 3 variant that expands regional coverage from 49 regions to 214 countries, while keeping the high and harmonized sectoral detail. We show the relevance of disaggregation for land-use accounting. Previous rest-of-the-world regions supply one-third of global land, which is used to produce a large range of different products under very different levels of productivity. We find that the aggregation of regions leads to a difference in the balance of land embodied in trade of up to 6% and a difference of land embodied in imports of up to 68% for individual countries and up to 600% for land-use-relevant sectors. Whilst the database can still be considered experimental, it is expected to increase the accuracy of estimates for environmental footprint studies of the original EXIOBASE countries, and provides the first estimates for the countries in the previous rest-of-the world. © 2020, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [11] Erb K.-H., Gaube V., Krausmann F., Plutzar C., Bondeau A., Haberl H., A comprehensive global 5 min resolution land-use data set for the year 2000 consistent with national census data, J Land Use Sci, 2, pp. 191-224, (2007)
  • [12] (2008)
  • [13] FAOSTAT—Prodstat
  • [14] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United, (2014)
  • [15] FAOSTAT—land Use, (2019)
  • [16] Gaulier G., Zignago S., Baci: International trade database at the product-level, (2010)
  • [17] Gibbons J.C., Wolsky A.M., Tolley G., Approximate aggregation and error in input-output models, Resour Energy, 4, pp. 203-230, (1982)
  • [18] Giljum S., Wieland H., Lutter S., Eisenmenger N., Schandl H., Owen A., The impacts of data deviations between MRIO models on material footprints: a comparison of EXIOBASE, Eora, and ICIO, J Ind Ecol, 23, 4, pp. 946-958, (2019)
  • [19] Golan A., Vogel S.J., Estimation of non-stationary social accounting matrix coefficients with supply-side information, Econ Syst Res, 12, pp. 447-471, (2000)
  • [20] Hambye C., Hertveldt B., Michel B., Does consistency with detailed national data matter for calculating carbon footprints with global multi-regional input–output tables? A comparative analysis for Belgium based on a structural decomposition, J Econ Struct, 7, (2018)