A Novel System Architecture for the National Integration of Electronic Health Records: A Semi-Centralized Approach

被引:0
作者
Asma AlJarullah
Samir El-Masri
机构
[1] King Saud University,Department of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Sciences
来源
Journal of Medical Systems | 2013年 / 37卷
关键词
Semi-centralized EHR; Distributed EHR; EHR-integration; Medical record linkage; Electronic health records;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The goal of a national electronic health records integration system is to aggregate electronic health records concerning a particular patient at different healthcare providers’ systems to provide a complete medical history of the patient. It holds the promise to address the two most crucial challenges to the healthcare systems: improving healthcare quality and controlling costs. Typical approaches for the national integration of electronic health records are a centralized architecture and a distributed architecture. This paper proposes a new approach for the national integration of electronic health records, the semi-centralized approach, an intermediate solution between the centralized architecture and the distributed architecture that has the benefits of both approaches. The semi-centralized approach is provided with a clearly defined architecture. The main data elements needed by the system are defined and the main system modules that are necessary to achieve an effective and efficient functionality of the system are designed. Best practices and essential requirements are central to the evolution of the proposed architecture. The proposed architecture will provide the basis for designing the simplest and the most effective systems to integrate electronic health records on a nation-wide basis that maintain integrity and consistency across locations, time and systems, and that meet the challenges of interoperability, security, privacy, maintainability, mobility, availability, scalability, and load balancing.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Eichelberg M(2005)A survey and analysis of electronic healthcare record standards ACM Comput Surv 37 277-315
[2]  
Aden T(2005)Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs Heal. Aff. 24 1103-1117
[3]  
Riesmeier J(2007)Sharing and management of EHR data through a national archive: Experiences from Finland World Hosp Health Serv 43 38-41
[4]  
Dogac A(2005)The Indiana network for patient care: A working local health information infrastructure Heal. Aff. 24 1214-1220
[5]  
Laleci G(2010)Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary care record in England: A mixed-method case study BMJ 340 c3111-601
[6]  
Hillestad R(2005)Health care IT collaboration in Massachusetts: The experience of creating regional connectivity J Am Med Inform Assoc 12 596-89
[7]  
Bigelow J(2010)Attitudes and behaviors related to the introduction of electronic health records among Austrian and German citizens Int J Med Inform 79 81-126
[8]  
Bower A(2006)Personal health records: Definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption J Am Med Inform Assoc 13 121-N201
[9]  
Girosi F(2001)Online personal medical records: Are they reliable for acute/critical care? Crit. Care Med. 29 N196-180
[10]  
Meili R(2002)Personal health records: Evaluation of functionality and utility J Am Med Inform Assoc. 9 171-10