The benefits of cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation are increased in Osteoporotic bone: A finite element analysis

被引：23
作者：
Wang W. [1 ]
Baran G.R. [1 ]
Garg H. [2 ]
Betz R.R. [3 ]
Moumene M. [4 ]
Cahill P.J. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19104
[2] Artemis Health Institute, Gurgaon 122001, Haryana
[3] Shriners Hospitals for Children-Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19140
[4] DePuy Synthes Spine, Inc., Raynham, MA 02767
来源：
Spine Deformity | 2014年 / 2卷 / 4期
关键词：
Cement; Finite element analysis; Osteoporosis; Pedicle screw; PMMA;
D O I：
10.1016/j.jspd.2014.03.002
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Study Design Biomechanical study using a finite element model of a normal and osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae comparing resistance with axial pullout and bending forces on polymethylmethacrylate-augmented and non-augmented pedicle screws. Objective To compare the effect of cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation in normal and osteoporotic bone with 2 different techniques of cement delivery. Summary of Background Data Various clinical and biomechanical studies have addressed the benefits of cement augmentation of pedicle screws, but none have evaluated whether this effect is similar, magnified, or attenuated in osteoporotic bone compared with normal bone. In addition, no study has compared the biomechanical strength of augmented pedicle screws using cement delivery through the pedicle screw with delivery through a pilot hole. Methods This study was funded by a grant from DePuy Synthes Spine. Normal and osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae with pedicle screws were simulated. The models were tested for screw pullout strength with and without cement augmentation. Two methods of cement delivery were also tested. Both methods were tested using 1 and 2.5 cm 3 volume of cement infiltrated in normal and osteoporotic bone. Results The increase in screw pullout force was proportionally greater in osteoporotic bone with equivalent volumes of cement delivered. The researchers found that 1 and 2.5 cm3 of cement infiltrated bone volume resulted in an increase in pullout force by about 50% and 120% in normal bone, and by about 64% and 156% in osteoporotic bone, respectively. The delivery method had only a minimal effect on pullout force when 2.5 cm3 of cement was injected (<4% difference). Conclusions Cement augmentation increases the fixation strength of pedicle screws, and this effect is proportionately greater in osteoporotic bone. Cement delivery through fenestrated screws and delivery through a pilot hole result in comparable pullout strength at higher cement volumes. © 2014 Scoliosis Research Society.
引用
收藏
页码：248 / 259
页数：11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Frankel B.M., Jones T., Wang C., Segmental polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw fixation in patients with bone softening caused by osteoporosis and metastatic tumor involvement: A clinical evaluation, Neurosurgery, 61, pp. 531-537, (2007)
  • [2] Flahiff C.M., Gober G.A., Nicholas R.W., Pullout strength of fixation screws from polymethylmethacrylate bone cement, Biomaterials, 16, pp. 533-536, (1995)
  • [3] Cameron H.U., Jacob R., Macnab I., Et al., Use of polymethylmethacrylate to enhance screw fixation in bone, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 57, pp. 655-656, (1975)
  • [4] Zindrick M.R., Wiltse L.L., Widell E.H., Et al., A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 203, pp. 99-112, (1986)
  • [5] Sarzier J.S., Evans A.J., Cahill D.W., Increased pedicle screw pullout strength with vertebroplasty augmentation in osteoporotic spines, J Neurosurg, 96, pp. 309-312, (2002)
  • [6] Soshi S., Shiba R., Kondo H., Et al., An experimental study on transpedicular screw fixation in relation to osteoporosis of the lumbar spine, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 16, pp. 1335-1341, (1991)
  • [7] Blattert T.R., Glasmacher S., Riesner H.J., Et al., Revision characteristics of cement-augmented, cannulated-fenestrated pedicle screws in the osteoporotic vertebral body: A biomechanical in vitro investigation. Technical note, J Neurosurg Spine, 11, pp. 23-27, (2009)
  • [8] Wittenberg R.H., Lee K.S., Shea M., Et al., Effect of screw diameter, insertion technique, and bone cement augmentation of pedicular screw fixation strength, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 296, pp. 278-287, (1993)
  • [9] Cook S.D., Salkeld S.L., Stanley T., Et al., Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone, Spine J, 4, pp. 402-408, (2004)
  • [10] Gaines Jr.R.W., The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 82, pp. 1458-1476, (2000)
12345