A new type of cities for liveable futures. Isobenefit Urbanism morphogenesis

被引:18
作者
D'Acci, Luca [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Interuniv Dept Reg & Urban Studies & Planning, Turin, Italy
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Social & Behav Sci, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Urban morphology; Isobenefit Urbanism; Utopia; Future megacity; Urbanization; Real estate market; CO2; EMISSIONS; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; AIR-QUALITY; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; LAND-USE; FORM; TRANSPORT; CITY; IMPACT; TRAVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.129
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Future cities? A morphogenetic code idea is presented. We need a conceptually different concept of cities which paradigmatically shifts their forms and structures toward more liveable future environments, both for us and our planet. The Isobenefit Urbanism is conceived within a medium-long term perspective mixing a macro top-down planning with a micro bottom-up spontaneous evolution in an attempt to moderate the human forces which typically induce agglomeration benefits and costs, maintaining the former while limiting the latter. It indicates a simple urban morphogenetic code to generate cities that are walkable, carless, low carbon, connected, compact, multifunctional settlements throughout nature, with unplanned forms and dinamically unlimitedly changeable/extendable, in which one can feel both urbanity and nature. By holding constant the number of inhabitants of a usual city/megacity, its Isobenefit city counterpart would enjoy the same (or greater) economies of scale benefits but without most of their costs. The Isobenefit Urbanism model might offer a potential solution to wild cementification, urban heat island effects, destruction of natural land and biodiversity, carbon emissions, congestion, air pollution, urbanicity and mental well-being, as well as provide a model to host the 3 billion new urban dwellers of the next few decades. Its ambition is to enjoy the economies of agglomeration without incurring to their diseconomies, manifested by sublinear and superlinear outputs scaling with city (population) size, typically infrastructural the former and socioeconomic the latter, without misusing lands and compromising daily rural/natural contacts.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 140
页数:13
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]   Urban form, commuting patterns and CO2 emissions: What differences between the municipality's residents and its jobs? [J].
Aguilera, Anne ;
Voisin, Marion .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2014, 69 :243-251
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, MATH URBAN MORPHOLOG
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, REAL ESTATE INVESTIN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CULTURAL EVOLUTION
[5]  
Banister D., 2007, SCI REG, V6, P99
[6]   Cities, mobility, and climate change [J].
Banister, David .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2007, 11 (02) :7-10
[7]   Assessing the reality-Transport and land use planning to achieve sustainability [J].
Banister, David .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT AND LAND USE, 2012, 5 (03) :1-14
[8]  
Batty M, 2018, INVENTING FUTURE CITIES, P1, DOI 10.7551/mitpress/11923.001.0001
[9]  
Batty M., 2012, Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age
[10]   A Theory of City Size [J].
Batty, Michael .
SCIENCE, 2013, 340 (6139) :1418-1419