The short-form headache impact test (HIT-6) was psychometrically equivalent in nine languages

被引:122
作者
Martin, M
Blaisdell, B
Kwong, JW
Bjorner, JB
机构
[1] Qual Metr Inc, Lincoln, RI 02865 USA
[2] GlaxoSmithKline, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
关键词
HIT-6; headache impact; health status; translation; disability due to headache; migraine;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.05.004
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objective: This study examined the psychometric properties and equivalence of the Six-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) across 1 languages in 14 countries. Methods: A multicenter. international cross-sectional study conducted in a primary care setting. Data obtained from 1. 171 adults from 14 countries who consulted their primary care physician for headache completed the HIT-6 questionnaire and a headache survey were included in this analysis. Item-level statistics (e.g., range of response choices used by participants), item-scale statistics (e.q.. item-total correlations), scale level statistics (e..g., internal consistency reliability), and tests of differential item functioning were conducted to examine the psychometric properties of all HIT-6 translations and their comparability across translations. Results: Across languages. missing data were low. item-scale correlations were high. reliability was adequate. and item-level statistics were generally comparable. We found only minor differential item functioning. suggesting that the HIT-6 translations are equivalent to the U.S. English form. Conclusions: Psychometric analyses indicate that most HIT-6 translations (Canadian English. French. Greek. Hungarian. UK English. Hebrew, Portuguese, German. Spanish, and Dutch) are comparable to U.S. English. Improvements may be needed in the Finnish and Slovakian translations and the appropriateness of using the HIT-6 in South Africa should be explored further. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1271 / 1278
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
American Psychological Association, 1985, Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, MAP R WINDOWS MULTIT
[3]  
Bayliss M., 2002, The HIT-6™: a user's guide
[4]   Using item response theory to calibrate the Headache Impact Test (HIT™) to the metric of traditional headache scales [J].
Bjorner, JB ;
Kosinski, M ;
Ware, JE .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (08) :981-1002
[5]   Differential Item Functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36 [J].
Bjorner, JB ;
Kreiner, S ;
Ware, JE ;
Damsgaard, MT ;
Bech, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1189-1202
[6]  
Bracken B., 1991, SCHOOL PSYCHOL INT, V12, P119, DOI [10.1177/0143034391121010, DOI 10.1177/0143034391121010]
[7]  
COUCH J, 2000, WORLD HEAD 2000 C LO
[8]   The role of concomitant headache types and non-headache co-morbidities in the underdiagnosis of migraine [J].
Diamond, ML .
NEUROLOGY, 2002, 58 (09) :S3-S9
[9]   Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: The IQOLA project approach [J].
Gandek, B ;
Ware, JE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :953-959
[10]   Translating the short-form headache impact test (HIT-6) in 27 countries: Methodological and conceptual issues [J].
Gandek, B ;
Alacoque, J ;
Uzun, V ;
Andrew-Hobbs, M ;
Davis, K .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (08) :975-979